2012
DOI: 10.1484/j.alma.5.100794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Genesis of the Algebra Textbook: From Pacioli to Euler

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was for others to develop Pacioli's first theorization of algebra and double entry into axiom‐based theory. The algebraists of the 16 th and 17 th centuries did so and developed his axiomatic approach to teaching algebra into axiom‐based theory (Heeffer, 2012, p. 39). The accounting masters did not, preferring to continue with an exemplar‐based approach that was augmented with rules in the 16 th century, firstly by Manzoni (1540) and then by those that followed, up to the present day.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was for others to develop Pacioli's first theorization of algebra and double entry into axiom‐based theory. The algebraists of the 16 th and 17 th centuries did so and developed his axiomatic approach to teaching algebra into axiom‐based theory (Heeffer, 2012, p. 39). The accounting masters did not, preferring to continue with an exemplar‐based approach that was augmented with rules in the 16 th century, firstly by Manzoni (1540) and then by those that followed, up to the present day.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason I have not included algebra texts from the Seventeenth century and earlier. A history of early algebra is given by Stedall [21], and the classic history of mathematical notations is Cajori's [22], but see also Heeffer [23].…”
Section: Use Of Historic Textbooksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through her archival studies, Ulivi has shed light on the teaching of abaco in the 14 th and 15 th centuries, and on Pacioli's life; and Ciocci (2009, 103-106) has reconstructed the process that transformed Pacioli from a practical mathematician in the 1470s into a theoretical mathematician by the 1490s. Yet more insights have been presented by other historians of mathematics, such as Fenny Smith (2008) (or Rankin 1992 and Albrecht Heeffer (2010Heeffer ( , 2012, for whom Pacioli's capacity to explain, to offer original solutions, and to organize his teaching in a manner that emphasized learning from single generalizable examples rather than repetitive rote, set him aside from his peers. Through their efforts, we now have a far clearer contextualization of the nature of Pacioli's writings and, thereby, his teaching.…”
Section: Pacioli's Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After being awarded his degree in the early 1480s, Pacioli emulated Euclid's gathering of source material, spending over a decade seeking out abaco problems and solutions in the manuscripts of his predecessors, scouring libraries 23 for sources and ideas, particularly in Florence (Ciocci 2009;Heeffer 2012). In this, as he acknowledges in Summa Arithmetica, Pacioli was indebted to the works of Leonardo Pisano (Fibonacci) (c. 1170-c. 1240), widely recognized as the inspiration for abaco mathematics.…”
Section: Pacioli Euclid Algebra and Double Entrymentioning
confidence: 99%