2010
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/721/2/l134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Generation of Strong Magnetic Fields During the Formation of the First Stars

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
206
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
8
206
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, stellar feedback or gravitational infall would produce a shock, i.e., a discontinuity, but we see a rather smooth gradient, which is most likely associated with shear (Kruijssen et al 2016, in preparation). Such large-scale systematic motions must be subtracted in order to isolate the turbulent motions on scales smaller or equal to the size of the cloud (e.g., Burkert & Bodenheimer 2000;Sur et al 2010;Federrath et al 2011b). In order to isolate the turbulent motions, we fit the gradient with a plane, shown in the middle panel, and then subtract it from the original velocity map (shown in the top right-hand panel of Figure 4).…”
Section: Velocity Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, stellar feedback or gravitational infall would produce a shock, i.e., a discontinuity, but we see a rather smooth gradient, which is most likely associated with shear (Kruijssen et al 2016, in preparation). Such large-scale systematic motions must be subtracted in order to isolate the turbulent motions on scales smaller or equal to the size of the cloud (e.g., Burkert & Bodenheimer 2000;Sur et al 2010;Federrath et al 2011b). In order to isolate the turbulent motions, we fit the gradient with a plane, shown in the middle panel, and then subtract it from the original velocity map (shown in the top right-hand panel of Figure 4).…”
Section: Velocity Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. In a companion paper (Sur et al 2010), we present numerical simulations confirming the importance of dynamo amplification during gravitational collapse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The final stellar masses are determined by the balance of the above competing effects, which would also be affected by stellar radiative feedback (e.g., Stacy et al 2012;Susa 2013). Moreover, recent magnetohydrodynamic simulations show that even a small amount of turbulence can amplify magnetic fields by a dynamo mechanism (Sur et al 2010;Federrath et al 2011;Sur et al 2012;Turk et al 2012). The existence of magnetic fields would increase angular momentum transfer in the disc via magnetic braking, preventing disc fragmentation as well as enhancing accretion rates on to the protostars (e.g., Machida & Doi 2013).…”
Section: Uncertainty In Mass Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%