2000
DOI: 10.1007/s00585-000-0799-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The generation of non aspect sensitive plasma density irregularities by field aligned drifts in the lower ionosphere

Abstract: Abstract. A theory of the generation of plasma density irregularities with virtually no aspect sensitivity, in the lower ionosphere at high latitudes, by electron drifts aligned with the geomagnetic ®eld, is presented. The theory is developed through¯uid equations in which the destabilising mechanism involves positive feedback from electron collisional heating. When ®eld aligned electron drift speeds exceed a few km s , this eect destabilises waves with wavelengths in excess of a few tens of metres in the lowe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the gradient-drift effect cannot be considered the controlling source of electron heating. Similarly, the theory by Robinson and Schlegel [2000] on the generation of non-aspect-sensitive plasma density irregularities by fieldaligned drifts is unlikely to explain electron heating because the dependence on the field-aligned drift direction would make the highly consistent dependence on E c unlikely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the gradient-drift effect cannot be considered the controlling source of electron heating. Similarly, the theory by Robinson and Schlegel [2000] on the generation of non-aspect-sensitive plasma density irregularities by fieldaligned drifts is unlikely to explain electron heating because the dependence on the field-aligned drift direction would make the highly consistent dependence on E c unlikely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hence conclude that our observations can likely not be explained by regular auroral backscatter. We note, however, that we can also not exclude the mechanism(s) proposed by Robinson and Schlegel [2000]. However, our current database does not allow us to check their proposal of electron drifts aligned with the geomagnetic field, neither are we in the position to speculate about the additional nonlinear feedback processes that are required in their work to shift the plasma waves into the right wavelength range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…However, after detailed discussion, Rüster and Schlegel [1999] concluded that their observations could not be explained by these mechanisms and that other alternative processes need to be invoked. One such alternative was presented by Robinson and Schlegel [2000], who proposed a new instability mechanism based on field‐aligned electron drifts with additional positive feedback from electron collisional heating. Realizing that their theory predicted, however, only waves in excess of a few tens of meters, Robinson and Schlegel [2000] further speculated about additional nonlinear feedback mechanisms that could possibly shift the the wavelength range of the instability to the required value of ∼3 m. However, since the observations of Rüster and Schlegel [1999] were never repeated such that no additional observational constraints are available, it remains an open question whether or not the mechanisms proposed by Robinson and Schlegel [2000] do occur and lead to detectable radar echoes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%