1971
DOI: 10.1002/qua.560050603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The generalized separated electron pair model. II. An application to NH, NH3, NH, NH2− and N3−

Abstract: AbstractsThe Separated Electron Pair (SEP) model (Strongly Orthogonal Geminals) and methods for its systematic extension has been applied to the series: NHZ , NH, , NH, , NH2-and N3-. On going from NH; to N", the SEP model, in its most general form, recovers 85-75% of the intrapair correlation energy and 60-55% of the interpair correlation energy obtainable with the given basis set. The best wave functions for each species recovered about 45-50% of the total empirical correlation energy which is expected to be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is necessary to compare the SPCCI method with other closely related correlation methods 22, 23, 25–38. The generalized valence bond–perfect pairing (GVB‐PP) wave function is a simplified SEP wave function 25.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is necessary to compare the SPCCI method with other closely related correlation methods 22, 23, 25–38. The generalized valence bond–perfect pairing (GVB‐PP) wave function is a simplified SEP wave function 25.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generalized valence bond–perfect pairing (GVB‐PP) wave function is a simplified SEP wave function 25. Some earlier approaches 28–31 to extend the SEP theory were essentially traditional MR‐CI methods, although natural orbitals from the SEP wave function were used in constructing configurations. The most successful works are the extended geminal (EG) models introduced by Røeggen in a series of papers 22, 23, 32–36.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using eq 3, the expression for the average number of pairs in a region (ft) may be expressed so as to incorporate the correlation term to yield Z>2(ft,ft) = f dr, f dr?£>2(r,,r2) = TV(ft)2 + F(ft,ft) Ja Ja (7) where F(ft,ft) = f dr, f dr2Z),(n)Di(r2)/(r,,r2) (8) Q %s F(ft,ft) is a measure of the total correlation which is contained within the region (ft), i.e., a measure of the intraloge correlation. For a Hartree-Fock wave function, which indues only Fermi correlation, the magnitude of F(ft,ft) is a measure of the total (integrated) Fermi hole of the JV(ft) particles that lies within the region (ft).…”
Section: Jwmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6] Associated with this result is the assumption that in some systems, a large fraction of the correlation energy may be described in terms of just TV/2 strongly intra-correlated pair functions, functions which are considered to be spatially localized and as a result transferrable between systems. This assumption is embodied in the method of "separated electron pairs" [7][8] and in the use of "strongly orthogonal geminals".9-10 The independent electron pair approximation, as recently reviewed by Kutzelnigg,11 is another such approach, but one which may be generalized to include all TV(TV -l)/2 pair interactions. The present work is related to these approaches in a useful way since it details the definition of regions of space which possess pure pair properties and in addition, yields values of the extent of intraand inter-pair correlation over and between well-defined spatial regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7] Sometimes this model is referred to as separated electron pair ͑SEP͒ theory. [8][9][10][11][12] Most prior studies focused on the total amount of correlation energy recovered by the product of strongly orthogonal geminals. It was generally concluded that the model has its limitations, primarily attributable to either lack of intergeminal correlation, 5 strong orthogonality approximation, 13 or both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%