1976
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1976.10480367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Generalized Jackknife: Finite Samples and Subsample Sizes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To estimate the null hypothesis distribution, a N × N matrix λ n,j was first estimated for each of the C subjects of the control database. The null distribution for each network n and CRSN j was then estimated using a generalized jackknife approach (Sharot, 1976 ). To do so, 2/3rd of the control sample was randomly selected to calculate the mean and standard deviation and one target sample was randomly selected among the remaining 1/3rd to compute the metric λ n,j under the null hypothesis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the null hypothesis distribution, a N × N matrix λ n,j was first estimated for each of the C subjects of the control database. The null distribution for each network n and CRSN j was then estimated using a generalized jackknife approach (Sharot, 1976 ). To do so, 2/3rd of the control sample was randomly selected to calculate the mean and standard deviation and one target sample was randomly selected among the remaining 1/3rd to compute the metric λ n,j under the null hypothesis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They focused on the bias, precision and accuracy of the seven jackknife estimators (Brose et al, 2003). Magnussen et al (2006) evaluated the generalized jackknife estimator, which is a linear combination of conventional jackknife estimators (Sharot, 1976). Chao (1987) found that the jackknife estimators were severely negatively biased for small sample sizes but performed better with increasing sample size.…”
Section: Jackknife Species Richness Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general procedure is re-estimating a parameter using only subsets of the samples, combining the new and the original estimates suitably weighted and producing a final estimate which is more accurate (Sharot, 1976). The method was originally developed by Quenouille (1956) and was later coined as ''jackknife'' by Tukey (1958).…”
Section: Jackknife Species Richness Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where U K−j is (K − j)-samples bound averaged over all possible choices of a subset of size K − j from ψ 1:K , and c(K, J, j) are Sharot coefficients (Sharot, 1976;Nowozin, 2018): Proof. First, we note that U K can be represented as marginal log-density plus some non-negative (due to theorem A.1) bias, which we'll consider in greater detail.…”
Section: E Debiasing the Bound E1 Deriving The Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%