1969
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1236(69)90015-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The general Stone-Weierstrass problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
169
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
169
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We now give an Urysohn lemma for TROs, based on Akemann's Urysohn lemma for C * -algebras [1,2,3,5]. See also [23] for a related result, with a different proof strategy (which relies on results of the second author [33]).…”
Section: Proof (I)⇒(ii)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now give an Urysohn lemma for TROs, based on Akemann's Urysohn lemma for C * -algebras [1,2,3,5]. See also [23] for a related result, with a different proof strategy (which relies on results of the second author [33]).…”
Section: Proof (I)⇒(ii)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose S ç B(H). Then (1) appr(S)" = [T: {V~XTVR} is convergent whenever {V") is an invertibly bounded sequence such that { V~XSV) is convergent for every S in § }, (2) // {V"} is an invertibly bounded sequence such that {V~XSV"} is convergent for every SinS, then m(A) = lim V~XAV" defines a homeomorphic isomorphism from appr(S)" onto appr(7r( §))".…”
Section: Corollary 23 If S Isa Separable Subset Ofb(h) Then #"( §)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statement (5) follows from (2)-(4) and the fact [44, Proposition 2.1] that every operator is approximately equivalent to a direct sum of irreducible operators. Statement (1) follows from the proofs of XV.6.1 and XV.6.2 in [14].…”
Section: Suppose T G B(h) Then (L)ß(t) < A(t) < ß(T)\ (2) If T = Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By part b of Lemma 0.2, if {r α } is an increasing approximate unit for K f = {a ∈ N : f (a * a + aa * ) = 0} with r α ↑ r ∈ N * * , then r α → 1 in the weak* topology of N . Then r is an open projection, hence regular in N by [1], Prop. II.14 since N is a von Neumann algebra.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%