2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2005.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The general practitioner's approach to irritable bowel syndrome: From intention to practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
63
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
63
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, studies have shown that general practitioners rarely misdiagnose IBS and their diagnoses are in close agreement with those made by gastroenterologist [36,37] in fact, there may be a tendency to under diagnosis IBS in primary care [36,37,38,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, studies have shown that general practitioners rarely misdiagnose IBS and their diagnoses are in close agreement with those made by gastroenterologist [36,37] in fact, there may be a tendency to under diagnosis IBS in primary care [36,37,38,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Frequency of mood and anxiety disorders in IBS patients evaluated in several studies and Frequency of 5%-15% for depression and 16%-19% for Anxiety have been reported (12,21) . These values of depression and anxiety are significantly more than general population (2,12,13) . While, using PSQI in IBS patients, the present study, have been dramatically calculated depression (71%), anxiety (76%), and stress (79%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Because general practitioners might not be considered to be experts in the diagnostic criteria for IBS, it is possible that some IBS patients were given false-positive diagnoses. However, studies have shown that general practitioners rarely misdiagnose IBS; [46][47][48][49] in fact, there may be a tendency to underdiagnosis IBS in primary care. However, the potential for a false-negative diagnosis of IBS is not directly relevant to this study because it was not our primary purpose to determine the prevalence of IBS.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%