Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1981
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4616/7/6/009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The general collective model applied to the chains of Pt, Os and W isotopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present work, we identify a level at 1158.95 (8) keV that we associate with the reported 1155-keV level. This identification is based on two depopulating transitions.…”
Section: (4 + ) Level At 1155 Kevsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present work, we identify a level at 1158.95 (8) keV that we associate with the reported 1155-keV level. This identification is based on two depopulating transitions.…”
Section: (4 + ) Level At 1155 Kevsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Initial studies [7,8] involving a variety of different models indicated a small mixing between the γ and β bands. In addition, later calculations, based on improved measurements of B(E2) transition strengths, yielded absolute matrix elements between the 2 + γ and 2 + β states in 182 W on the order of ∼2 keV [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electromagnetic transition strengths can be calculated from the matrix elements of the collective multipole operators. The general E2 operator for the geometric model [27,28,29] may be expanded in laboratory frame coordinates α 2µ as [30] …”
Section: Consider the Bohr Hamiltonian [4]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many GCM studies have retained the secondorder term [7], but inclusion of this or other higher-order terms destroys the simple invariance of B(E2) ratios, since the different terms in (3) scale by different powers of a under dilation. The second-order term usually provides only a relatively small correction to the linear term, and the correct coefficient by which it should be normalized is highly uncertain [4,8]. Comparative studies by Petkov, Dewald, and Andrejtscheff [16] have shown no clear benefit to its inclusion for the nuclei considered.…”
Section: Scaling Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once wave functions for the nuclear eigenstates are calculated, electromagnetic matrix elements can be evaluated. The most commonly used expression for the electric quadrupole operator is deduced using the assumption that the nuclear charge is uniformly distributed within a radius R = R 0 (1 + µ α 2µ Y * 2µ ) [4,8], which leads to a series expression…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%