The gendered effects of entrepreneurialism in contrasting contexts

Abstract

Purpose Contrasting Sweden and Tanzania, this paper aims to explore the experiences of women entrepreneurs affected by entrepreneurialism. This study discusses the impact on their position in society and on their ability to take feminist action. Design/methodology/approach This paper analysed interviews conducted in the two countries over 15 years, using a holistic perspective on context, including its gendered dimensions. Findings The results amount to a critique of entrepreneurialism. Women in Sweden did not experience much gain from entrepreneurship, while in Tanzania results were mixed. Entrepreneurialism seems unable to improve the situation for women in the relatively well-functioning economies in the global north, where it was designed. Research limitations/implications In mainstream entrepreneurship studies, there is a focus on the institutional context. From the analysis, it is apparent that equal attention must be given to the social and spatial contexts, as they may have severe material and economic consequences for entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship. The paper raises questions for further studies on the gendering of markets in different contexts, as well as questions on the urban-rural dimension. Practical implications In Sweden, marketisation of welfare services led to more women-owned businesses, but the position of women did not improve. The results strongly convey the need for a careful analysis of the pre-existing context, before initiating reforms. Originality/value The paper adds to the understanding of context in entrepreneurship studies: Africa is largely an underexplored continent and contrasting North and South is an underexplored methodological approach. This paper further extends and develops the model of gendered contexts developed by Welter et al. (2014).

Timeout: The Role of Family-Friendly Policies in Business Start-Up Among Mothers

“…There is an inverse relationship between a country’s economic prosperity and the number of small businesses (Bosma et al, 2021), and some of the poorest countries in the world have the highest shares of women-owned businesses (Elam et al, 2019). Inverting the argument and making gender equality the overriding goal, we argue, like Tillmar et al (2022a), that in poorer patriarchal societies with dysfunctional states, business ownership may indeed be the only available means for women to achieve financial and other types of independence. In contrast, in wealthier countries with well-functioning states, a welfare model built on financial independence for each individual provides income security and subsidized daycare to help raise a family; it encourages gender equality in terms of sharing childcare and household work between men and women.…”

Women’s entrepreneurship in the GCC: a literature analysis from a socio-cultural perspective

“…In particular, women's entrepreneurship in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) has received little in-depth analysis (McAdam et al , 2020); the few studies that have been conducted tend to rely on the gender and entrepreneurship theories originally developed for the USA and Europe whose uncritical application to the GCC context may be problematic. Studying experiences of women entrepreneurs in Sweden and Tanzania, countries with varied contexts, Tillmar et al (2021) have emphasized the importance of understanding the social and institutional dynamics. Taking their approach forward, GCC’s complex socio-cultural milieu and economic circumstances call for a nuanced and context-specific examination that critically assesses the dominant theoretical approaches in this field to facilitate an appropriate application in the GCC (Kemppainen, 2019) which will allow for a deeper and more accurate analysis, paving the way for effective policy-making.…”

Women's rural businesses: for economic viability or gender equality? – a database study from the Swedish context

“…Most of these articles, however, focus on farm-based entrepreneurship (Bock and Shortall, 2006; Rijkers and Costa, 2012), leaving non-farm enterprises of rural women understudied. Moreover, since the gendering of context is of utmost importance to the understanding of entrepreneurship (Welter, 2020), results from the Global South are not easily transferable to advanced welfare states (Esping-Andersen, 1990, 2009) with their high levels of gender equality (Tillmar et al. , 2021).…”

“…Welter (2020) suggested that we need a differentiated view of what business success is. From a feminist perspective, we must ask whether entrepreneurship in rural areas does in fact offer something to further the position of women and benefit economic gender equality (Tillmar et al. , 2021) or if it is a false promise for women (Marlow, 2020).…”