2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00148-003-0160-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The gender wage gap and wage arrears in Russia: Evidence from the RLMS

Abstract: Using the RLMS, this paper re-examines the nature of the gender wage gap in Russia between 1994 and 1998 taking into account the pervasiveness of Russia's non-payment institutions. Investigating discrimination 'bands' at different sections of the income distribution and for various important sub-groups we found the following. Using censored regressions that capture the effect of wage arrears and payment inkind, the wage gap is larger than estimates derived using OLS. The wage gap is distributed unevenly both a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
46
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is important as it indicates the presence of different mechanisms describing the selection into wage work for men and women. A number of studies conducted on transition countries find no evidence of sample selection bias (Gerry et al 2004), while others conduct sample selection bias correction only for women, implicitly assuming that sample selection bias is an issue only for the female population (Arabsheibani and Lau 1999;Arabsheibani and Mussurov 2007). The results in this study point to a need to pay more attention to the causes of sample selection bias among men as well as women.…”
Section: Heckman Model: Evidence Of Sample Selection Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result is important as it indicates the presence of different mechanisms describing the selection into wage work for men and women. A number of studies conducted on transition countries find no evidence of sample selection bias (Gerry et al 2004), while others conduct sample selection bias correction only for women, implicitly assuming that sample selection bias is an issue only for the female population (Arabsheibani and Lau 1999;Arabsheibani and Mussurov 2007). The results in this study point to a need to pay more attention to the causes of sample selection bias among men as well as women.…”
Section: Heckman Model: Evidence Of Sample Selection Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the counterintuitive nature of this result, the vast majority of studies either does not address this issue or attribute it to a misspecification of the model. In fact, for former Soviet republics, all studies, which use the Heckman correction in the context of gender wage gap, obtain negative estimates of ρ, with none attempting to elaborate on its implications (e.g., Arabsheibani and Lau 1999;Cheidvasser and Benitez Silva 2007;Gerry et al 2004). …”
Section: Heckman Model: Evidence Of Sample Selection Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the crisis, the gender pay gap widened, with the substantial part of the wage gap explained by discrimination. Gerry, Kim and Li (2004) show that 18-34 year old women experienced the largest discrimination following the 1998 crisis. Welfare indicators from the RLMS show that the poverty rate increased from 22 percent in 1996 to 33 percent in 1998 (Lokshin and Ravallion, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Brainerd 1998). As many as 13 observations are reported in terms of contractual rather than actual wages, which can introduce bias if wage arrears are present (Gerry, Kim, and Li 2004;Ogloblin 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%