2017
DOI: 10.25071/1874-6322.40355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The gender lifetime earnings gap—exploring gendered pay from the life course perspective

Abstract: Research on the gender earnings divide so far mostly focuses on the gender gap in hourly wages, which due to its snapshot nature is unable to capture the biographical dimension of gendered pay. With the ‘gender lifetime earnings gap’ (GLEG), we introduce a new measure that fills this gap. Based on a group of 72,085 German individuals born 1950-64 from the ‘Sample of Integrated Labor Market Biographies’ (SIAB 7510), we find that at the end of the employment career, women accumulate 46.6% less earnings than men.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a subset of West German workers, Kunze (2005) finds a noticeable gender gap in hourly wages already present at labour market entry, and this essentially remains constant over 15 years. In contrast, the results of Boll et al (2017) point to even larger gender differences in accumulated lifetime earnings, which increase over the life course of several German cohorts. Explicitly taking into account divergent patterns of labour market attachment, this cumulative 'gender lifetime earnings gap' is up to twice as high as current cross-sectional estimates.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a subset of West German workers, Kunze (2005) finds a noticeable gender gap in hourly wages already present at labour market entry, and this essentially remains constant over 15 years. In contrast, the results of Boll et al (2017) point to even larger gender differences in accumulated lifetime earnings, which increase over the life course of several German cohorts. Explicitly taking into account divergent patterns of labour market attachment, this cumulative 'gender lifetime earnings gap' is up to twice as high as current cross-sectional estimates.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The use of largescale longitudinal data allows us to explore temporal dynamics in their subsequent lifetime income trajectories in detail -that is to say, how patterns of heterogeneity change or persist over different stages of life. Previous research has, for example, found time-varying associations between longitudinal income/ wage trajectories and factors such as gender (Manning and Swaffield, 2008;Boll et al, 2017;Albrecht et al, 2018), education (Tamborini et al, 2015;Bhuller et al, 2017) and parental background (Mayer, 2010). Therefore, we study heterogeneity in these relationships by gender, educational attainment and parents' socio-economic status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Compared to previous generations of mothers, the growing labor supply plays a major role in this context (Blau and Kahn, 2017;Kluve and Schmitz, 2018): on average, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Female Labor Force Participation (FLMP) rate is now 14% higher than in 1977, with Germany, in particular, showing an even greater increase, equating to 24% over the same time period (Mari, 2019). Higher education is, of course, another important aspect (Boll et al, 2017;O'Neill and Polachek, 1993). In the specific case of Germany, Boll and Leppin (2015) came to the conclusion that the residual wage gap is driven by factors such as employment experience, occupational position and hours worked.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closest to our paper is the study by Boll et al (2017) analyzing the gender lifetime earnings gap in Germany. Using the administrative Sample of Integrated Labour Market Biographies (SIAB), they estimate an unadjusted gender lifetime earnings gap of 46 percent for West German birth cohorts 1950 to 1964.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%