2004
DOI: 10.1086/383557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Gemini Deep Deep Survey. I. Introduction to the Survey, Catalogs, and Composite Spectra

Abstract: The Gemini Deep Deep Survey (GDDS) is an ultra-deep (K < 20.6 mag, I < 24.5 mag) redshift survey targeting galaxies in the "redshift desert" between 1 < z < 2. The primary goal of the survey is to constrain the space density at high redshift of evolved high-mass galaxies. We obtained 309 spectra in four widely-separated 30 arcmin 2 fields using the Gemini North telescope and the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph (GMOS). The spectra define a one-in-two sparse sample of the reddest and most luminous galaxies near… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
289
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(299 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
9
289
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4. For comparison, we also show the composite spectrum of field early-type galaxies at a similar redshift and covering are similar range of stellar masses, which was obtained by combining 11 GDSS (Abraham et al 2004) and 3 GMASS (Cimatti et al 2008) spectra in the range 1.3 < z < 1.5. It is interesting to note that, similar to what was found by Gobat et al (2008) (see also Rettura et al 2008), who compared the SFHs of earlytype galaxies in a massive cluster at z = 1.24 with those in the field, the 4000 Å break in cluster early-type galaxies appears to be larger than those in field galaxies, suggesting a higher formation redshift or a shorter duration of the star forming phase for early-type galaxies in massive clusters.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. For comparison, we also show the composite spectrum of field early-type galaxies at a similar redshift and covering are similar range of stellar masses, which was obtained by combining 11 GDSS (Abraham et al 2004) and 3 GMASS (Cimatti et al 2008) spectra in the range 1.3 < z < 1.5. It is interesting to note that, similar to what was found by Gobat et al (2008) (see also Rettura et al 2008), who compared the SFHs of earlytype galaxies in a massive cluster at z = 1.24 with those in the field, the 4000 Å break in cluster early-type galaxies appears to be larger than those in field galaxies, suggesting a higher formation redshift or a shorter duration of the star forming phase for early-type galaxies in massive clusters.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these 108 objects, 66 galaxies were selected from the (mostly) I-limited spectroscopic catalogue of the FORS deep field (FDF) spectroscopic survey (Noll et al 2004) and originally inspected for z > 2 by NP05. In addition, 34 galaxies were taken from the K s < 20-selected K20 survey in the GOODS-S and a field around quasar 0055-2659 (Cimatti et al 2002;Mignoli et al 2005), and 8 galaxies were selected from the I-and K s -limited Gemini deep deep survey (GDDS, Abraham et al 2004). For 88 objects from the FDF and K20 samples, the UV continuum slope could be determined in addition to the presence/absence of the UV bump (see NPPS).…”
Section: The Fdf K20 and Gdds Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, compared with other observational data, it is more rewarding to investigate the observational H(z) data directly, because it can take the fine structure of H(z) into consideration and then use the important information that this structure provides. By using the differential ages of passively evolving galaxies determined from the Gemini Deep Deep Survey (GDDS) (Abraham et al 2004) and archival data (Treu et al 2001(Treu et al , 2002Nolan et al 2003a,b), Simon et al (2005) determined nine values of the Hubble parameter H(z) in the range 0 ≤ z ≤ 1.8, which have been used to constrain the parameters of various dark energy models (Samushia & Ratra 2006;Wei & Zhang 2007;Wu & Yu 2007a,b;Zhang & Zhu 2007;Kurek & Szydlowski 2007;Lazkoz & Majerotto 2007;Sen & Scherrer 2008;Wan et al 2007;Xu et al 2008;Zhai et al 2010). The H(z) data at 11 different redshifts were determined from the differential ages of red-envelope galaxies (Stern et al 2010), and two more Hubble parameter data points H(z = 0.24) = 79.69 ± 4.61 and H(z = 0.43) = 86.45 ± 5.96 were obtained by Gaztañaga et al (2009) from observations of BAO peaks (for a review of the observational H(z) data, see Zhang et al 2010).…”
Section: The Observational H(z) Datamentioning
confidence: 99%