1964
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(64)90029-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The gecko retina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar situation exists in the pure rod retinas of nocturnal Tokay geckos (Crescitelli et al, 1977), where three of the cone pigment classes, SWS1, Rh2, and LWS, have been retained (Kojima et al, 1992;Yokoyama and Blow, 2001). In these geckos, the middle-wavelength-sensitive photoreceptors which are described as rod-like on the basis of morphology and sensitivity to light (Pedier and Tilly, 1964;Tansley, 1964;Kleinschmidt and Dowling, 1975;Rispoli et al, 1993) express a "cone" Rh2 gene (Yokoyama and Blow, 2001), consistent with Walls' transmutation theory (Walls, 1934(Walls, , 1942. In contrast, P. regius and X. unicolor have retained the Rh1 gene in their middle-wavelength-sensitive rod photoreceptors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar situation exists in the pure rod retinas of nocturnal Tokay geckos (Crescitelli et al, 1977), where three of the cone pigment classes, SWS1, Rh2, and LWS, have been retained (Kojima et al, 1992;Yokoyama and Blow, 2001). In these geckos, the middle-wavelength-sensitive photoreceptors which are described as rod-like on the basis of morphology and sensitivity to light (Pedier and Tilly, 1964;Tansley, 1964;Kleinschmidt and Dowling, 1975;Rispoli et al, 1993) express a "cone" Rh2 gene (Yokoyama and Blow, 2001), consistent with Walls' transmutation theory (Walls, 1934(Walls, , 1942. In contrast, P. regius and X. unicolor have retained the Rh1 gene in their middle-wavelength-sensitive rod photoreceptors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In this theory, Walls suggested that the duplex retinas of early terrestrial tetrapods lost all rods in response to a complete diurnal lifestyle with a sole dependency on sunlight. With the rise of birds and mammals and the ensuing complex prey-predator relationships, many reptiles became "secondarily" nocturnal and their cones "transmutated" into photoreceptors with rod-like characteristics of a lower activation threshold and an increased sensitivity to light (Pedier and Tilly, 1964;Tansley, 1964;Kleinschmidt and Dowling, 1975;Rispoli et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence of cone-to-rod transmutation in nocturnal geckos has been extensively demonstrated using both cellular and molecular techniques (Crescitelli, 1956;Dodt and Walther, 1958;Kojima et al, 1992;McDevitt et al, 1993;Röll, 2001;Sakami et al, 2014;Tansley, 1959Tansley, , 1961Tansley, , 1964Zhang et al, 2006), while evidence of rod-to-cone transmutation in colubrid snakes remains somewhat sparse (Schott et al, 2016). In order to demonstrate rod-to-cone transmutation in the retina, there needs to be evidence of a functional rod machinery in a photoreceptor with some rod-like features in a retina that appears, superficially, to consist of only cones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A light-induced increase in input resistance has been described also in rod cells of the gecko (Toyoda et al 1969). These cells, however, are said to represent transmuted cones (Walls, 1963;Tansley, 1964) and may not share the properties of rod cells in other retinae. In the frog, osmotic experiments indicate that light reduces the sodium permeability of isolated rod outer segments (Korenbrot & Cone, 1972), but electrical measurements on the same material fail to reveal the expected increase in surface membrane resistance (Falk & Fatt, 1973).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%