2006
DOI: 10.2172/896014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Gated X-ray Detector for the National Ignition Facility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 (b). The change in l = 2 moment (P2) between the inflight and hot spot symmetry [45] (non-conformal P2) for N170706 is thought to be due to cooling of the outer regions of the hot spot. This experiment used the same target configuration and pointing, same hohlraum gas fill density (0.6 mg/cc), similar laser energy (N150826∼1.42MJ vs N170706∼1.46 MJ), similar pulse length (N150826∼13.6ns vs N170706∼13.2ns), and similar laser cone fraction during the peak of the pulse (N150826∼34% vs N170706∼35%).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 (b). The change in l = 2 moment (P2) between the inflight and hot spot symmetry [45] (non-conformal P2) for N170706 is thought to be due to cooling of the outer regions of the hot spot. This experiment used the same target configuration and pointing, same hohlraum gas fill density (0.6 mg/cc), similar laser energy (N150826∼1.42MJ vs N170706∼1.46 MJ), similar pulse length (N150826∼13.6ns vs N170706∼13.2ns), and similar laser cone fraction during the peak of the pulse (N150826∼34% vs N170706∼35%).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%