2006
DOI: 10.1136/ebm.11.2.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The GATE frame: critical appraisal with pictures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
76
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As revisões sistemáticas foram avaliadas segundo protocolos específicos 23,24 , e os trabalhos randomizados controlados foram avaliados pelo escore de Jadad.…”
Section: Critérios De Seleção Das Publicaçõesunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As revisões sistemáticas foram avaliadas segundo protocolos específicos 23,24 , e os trabalhos randomizados controlados foram avaliados pelo escore de Jadad.…”
Section: Critérios De Seleção Das Publicaçõesunclassified
“…-A duração pequena e variável do seguimento (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) horas) limita a extrapolação dos achados para períodos maiores.…”
Section: Limitações Do Estudo Segundo Os Autoresunclassified
“…Any disagreement was resolved through discussion. Each article was assessed using the GATE-Lite (Jackson et al, 2006) and CanChild forms (Lammi & Law, 2003) while applying a predetermined data abstraction procedure. Questions about articles were discussed among the authors to resolve any lack of clarity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…independently appraised the quality of studies using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool 13 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or an 18-question checklist for nonrandomized studies and case series that was adapted from several sources. [14][15][16][17] This tool has been used previously for systematic reviews that have included nonrandomized evidence.…”
Section: Review Processmentioning
confidence: 99%