Abstract:The growing use of drugs in this country has caused the work of the toxicological chemist to become increasingly difficult. More and more, the courts, police departments, and coroners have had to rely on the chemist for evidence in respect to identification of drugs. In many cases testing procedures commonly used today do not, in fact, establish the identity of a substance of interest with a desirable degree of certainty and the presumptive identification needs confirmation by other techniques.
“…The same year, M. Blomquist et al provided fascinating details of 13 randomly selected cases in which GC-MS had helped to identify drugs in various biological tissues at a government laboratory in Sweden . In 1972, R. F. Skinner et al reviewed the status of GC-MS for forensic toxicology . His group had used a new Finnigan 1015C GC-MS, and most of the reported casework involved the detection of barbiturates in various body fluids “within 15 min,” assuming the instrument was in standby mode …”
Section: Drugs and Toxicologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1972, R. F. Skinner et al reviewed the status of GC-MS for forensic toxicology . His group had used a new Finnigan 1015C GC-MS, and most of the reported casework involved the detection of barbiturates in various body fluids “within 15 min,” assuming the instrument was in standby mode …”
Section: Drugs and Toxicologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 In 1972, R. F. Skinner et al reviewed the status of GC-MS for forensic toxicology. 39 His group had used a new Finnigan 1015C GC-MS, and most of the reported casework involved the detection of barbiturates in various body fluids "within 15 min," assuming the instrument was in standby mode. 39 Around the same time, S. Agurell and colleagues, in Sweden, had also used GC-MS and mass fragmentography to identify drugs in various cases.…”
Section: ■ Drugs and Toxicologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 His group had used a new Finnigan 1015C GC-MS, and most of the reported casework involved the detection of barbiturates in various body fluids "within 15 min," assuming the instrument was in standby mode. 39 Around the same time, S. Agurell and colleagues, in Sweden, had also used GC-MS and mass fragmentography to identify drugs in various cases. 40,41 Applications included precursors of mescaline in Peyote cactus and various drugs in the blood of subjects who had recently smoked them.…”
Mass spectrometry has made profound contributions to
the criminal
justice system by providing an instrumental method of analysis that
delivers exquisite analytical figures of merit for a wide variety
of samples and analytes. Applications include the characterization
of trace metal impurities in hair and glass to the identification
of drugs, explosives, polymers, and ignitable liquids. This review
describes major historical developments and, where possible, relates
the developed capabilities to casework and legal precedents. This
review also provides insight into how historical applications have
evolved into, and out of, modern consensus standards. Unlike many
pattern-based techniques and physical-matching methods, mass spectrometry
has strong scientific foundations and a long history of successful
applications that have made it one of the most reliable and respected
sources of scientific evidence in criminal and civil cases. That said,
in several appellate decisions in which mass spectrometric evidence
was challenged but admitted, decisions sometimes still went against
the mass spectrometric data anyway, which goes to show that mass spectrometric
evidence is always just one piece of the larger legal puzzle.
“…The same year, M. Blomquist et al provided fascinating details of 13 randomly selected cases in which GC-MS had helped to identify drugs in various biological tissues at a government laboratory in Sweden . In 1972, R. F. Skinner et al reviewed the status of GC-MS for forensic toxicology . His group had used a new Finnigan 1015C GC-MS, and most of the reported casework involved the detection of barbiturates in various body fluids “within 15 min,” assuming the instrument was in standby mode …”
Section: Drugs and Toxicologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1972, R. F. Skinner et al reviewed the status of GC-MS for forensic toxicology . His group had used a new Finnigan 1015C GC-MS, and most of the reported casework involved the detection of barbiturates in various body fluids “within 15 min,” assuming the instrument was in standby mode …”
Section: Drugs and Toxicologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 In 1972, R. F. Skinner et al reviewed the status of GC-MS for forensic toxicology. 39 His group had used a new Finnigan 1015C GC-MS, and most of the reported casework involved the detection of barbiturates in various body fluids "within 15 min," assuming the instrument was in standby mode. 39 Around the same time, S. Agurell and colleagues, in Sweden, had also used GC-MS and mass fragmentography to identify drugs in various cases.…”
Section: ■ Drugs and Toxicologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 His group had used a new Finnigan 1015C GC-MS, and most of the reported casework involved the detection of barbiturates in various body fluids "within 15 min," assuming the instrument was in standby mode. 39 Around the same time, S. Agurell and colleagues, in Sweden, had also used GC-MS and mass fragmentography to identify drugs in various cases. 40,41 Applications included precursors of mescaline in Peyote cactus and various drugs in the blood of subjects who had recently smoked them.…”
Mass spectrometry has made profound contributions to
the criminal
justice system by providing an instrumental method of analysis that
delivers exquisite analytical figures of merit for a wide variety
of samples and analytes. Applications include the characterization
of trace metal impurities in hair and glass to the identification
of drugs, explosives, polymers, and ignitable liquids. This review
describes major historical developments and, where possible, relates
the developed capabilities to casework and legal precedents. This
review also provides insight into how historical applications have
evolved into, and out of, modern consensus standards. Unlike many
pattern-based techniques and physical-matching methods, mass spectrometry
has strong scientific foundations and a long history of successful
applications that have made it one of the most reliable and respected
sources of scientific evidence in criminal and civil cases. That said,
in several appellate decisions in which mass spectrometric evidence
was challenged but admitted, decisions sometimes still went against
the mass spectrometric data anyway, which goes to show that mass spectrometric
evidence is always just one piece of the larger legal puzzle.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.