Abstract.-A number of Vendian (latest Precambrian) body fossils have traditionally been considered arthropods or arthropodlike organisms. Several Cambrian "weird wonders" have also been linked with the arthropods. However, these relationships are difficult to express in traditional Linnean systematics. I present a morphological cladistic analysis of seven Vendian "arthropodlike" taxa compared with 21 representative Cambrian arthropods, lobopods, and weird wonders. Four arthropods from the later Phanerozoic (a pycnogonid, a monuran, and the problematic Chebnielbn and Arthropleura), five extant tardigrades, two extant kinorhynchs, and an extant priapulid, myriapod, pycnogonid, and onychophoran are also included. Monophyly of the Arthropoda is supported, but the anomalocarids and their relatives (Anomalopoda) fall out very close to the base of the traditional Arthropoda and should be included within it. The relationships among arthropods with uniramous appendages are not well resolved, but the group does not appear to be monophyletic. The biramous arthropods do form a clade and are divided into a crustaceanomorph clade and an arachnomorph clade that includes the trilobites. Most Vendian arthropodlike fossils form two clades, the Vendiamorpha and the Sprigginidae, in the arthropod stem group. The Lobopoda is a monophyletic clade with three branches: tardigrades, onychophorans, and marine lobopods. An unranked taxonomic scheme is proposed for the major clades identified here. There is no compelling reason to accept the hypothesis that the Vendian organisms included here are not metazoans. [Precambrian; Vendian; Ediacara fauna; Cambrian; problematica; arthropod; lobopod.] There is something about writing about arthropod phylogeny that brings out the worst in people.-J. W. Hedgpeth (Schram, 1981) The soft-bodied megafossils of the Vendian or Ediacaran (late Precambrian or Neoproterozoic) have classically been considered metazoans in extant phyla, often in or near extant classes or orders (e.g., Glaessner, 1984). However, a number of dissenting opinions place most or all of these fossils in an extinct kingdom Vendobionta (Seilacher, 1989(Seilacher, , 1992Bergstrom, 1991), an extinct metazoan phylum (Buss and Seilacher, 1994), or an extant nonmetazoan kingdom (e.g., Zhuravlev, 1993;Retallack, 1994), thereby denying them any direct significance for early metazoan evolution. Obstacles to considering the "Vendobionta" as early metazoans include the time gap between the disappearance of Vendian biotas and the appearances of Cambrian faunas, the lack of Vendian-type soft-bodied organisms in the Cambrian and later Lagerstatten; and supposed morphological disparity between most Vendian organisms and their Phanerozoic successors.Resolution of this debate would be desirable, because our understanding and interpretation of the Precambrian-Cambrian transition is colored by our taxonomic pronouncements. The magnitude of whatever extinction took place between the Vendian and Cambrian is an example of this. If the Vendian organisms...