2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The gap of stellar mass in galaxy groups: another perspective of the too-big-to-fail problem in the Milky Way

Abstract: The Milky Way presents the too-big-to-fail (TBTF) problem that there are two observed satellite galaxies with maximum circular velocity larger than 55km/s, and others have velocity less than 25km/s, but the cold dark matter model predicts there should be more than 10 subhaloes with velocity larger than 25km/s. Those massive subhaloes with 25km/s < V max < 55km/s should not have failed to form stars. The TBTF problem severely challenges the CDM model. Most efforts are seeking the effects of baryonic feedback, d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Milky Way analogs on average have only 0.3 satellites brighter than these luminosities, versus two for the Milky Way (Liu et al 2011). The distribution of these bright satellites is also remarkably consistent with simulations using fairly straightforward assumptions about the galaxy-halo connection Rodríguez-Puebla et al 2013;Kang et al 2016). It is below these luminosities that the Milky Way's satellite properties diverge from simple galaxy formation predictions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The Milky Way analogs on average have only 0.3 satellites brighter than these luminosities, versus two for the Milky Way (Liu et al 2011). The distribution of these bright satellites is also remarkably consistent with simulations using fairly straightforward assumptions about the galaxy-halo connection Rodríguez-Puebla et al 2013;Kang et al 2016). It is below these luminosities that the Milky Way's satellite properties diverge from simple galaxy formation predictions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The other problem is that the predicted central mass density is higher than observed (the "too-big-to-fail" problem, Boylan-Kolchin et al (2012). Several solutions have been proposed, such as the possibility that dark matter is not cold (e.g., Lovell et al 2012;Vogelsberger & Zavala 2013), an induced core arising from baryon physics and star formation (e.g., Brooks & Zolotov 2014;Guo et al 2015;Wetzel et al 2016;Brooks et al 2017), the MW having a lower halo mass (e.g., Vera-Ciro et al 2013;Dierickx & Loeb 2017) or the MW having a particular quirk of accreting its subhaloes (Kang et al (2016)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the current ΛCDM structure formation scenario, the most salient and persistent missmatch with observations occurs at the smallest scales, where models appear to over-predict the number of satellites a large galaxy like the Milky Way should have, e.g. Moore et al (1999), Kang et al (2016). Also, it is at the smallest scales of the dwarf spheroidal systems where tests of the dark matter hypothesis become cleaner and more sensitive, given the absence of gas and the presence of well studied stellar populations, they have been recently used to attempt predicting direct dark matter annihilation signals e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%