The Gap Between Science and Society and the Intrinsically Capitalistic Character of Science Communication

Arboledas-Lérida, Luis

doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2111670

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…How did the market become the pressing driving force behind scientific innovation? It can be fruitful to approach this question through the relationship between science and the market from the communicational perspective [Arboledas-Lérida, 2022;Gradim, 2019]. One communicational reason for this "inverted" scenario is the fact the profitable private sector cannot have the luxury of addressing a captive audience, contrary to the academy.…”

Section: The Market As a Powerful Innovation Drivermentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing (the) politics of participation in science

Fernandes¹

2023

Journal of Science Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Living Labs foster participatory prototyping and technology testing in “real-life” situations. The literature exhibits a weak approach to Living Labs’ power relations. It is crucial to understand the visual apparatus employed by Living Labs because they model power relations inherent to participation, especially when commercial interests are involved. Some Living Labs’ visual models display indifference towards power imbalances and unquestioned faith in progress, diminishing the space for divergent positions. Living Labs are just the newest manifestation of the fundamental challenges of making ethical participation and technological innovation compatible, given that increased participation may not translate necessarily into novelty.

show abstract

Section: The Market As a Powerful Innovation Drivermentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing (the) politics of participation in science

Fernandes¹

2023

Journal of Science Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Communications Revolution: from Civilizational Phenomenon to Science Communication Perspectives

Kolesnichenko

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the study, it was possible to carry out an overview of modern theories of communications revolutions and demonstrate their importance in transforming the foundations of the development of the corresponding social architecture, social institutions, including science, etc. In this analysis, we used the methodological approaches of the philosophy of history, communicative philosophy, social and political philosophy, and the philosophy of science. At the same time, the revolutionary scale of changes and the depth of their impact on society lead to the fact that humanity is forced to abandon the naive-romantic attitude to science (to rationalism as such), which was characteristic of the world at the beginning of the 20th century when it seemed that science was able to overcome all troubles and mistakes of both the physical and social world. That is why the current task of philosophy remains the study of the phenomenon of modern science as a communicative phenomenon of the dynamic 21st century. Industry 4.0 is a heuristic methodological framework for understanding the perspectives of civilizational shifts and re-configuration of communicative processes in science communication, taking into account the approaches of technical and public deliberation. We tended to demonstrate the profound polemical nature of the understanding of the revolutionary nature of social changes and the presence of a wide range of typologies of revolutions (scientific, industrial, communications ones).

show abstract

The Gap Between Science and Society and the Intrinsically Capitalistic Character of Science Communication

Cited by 2 publications

References 53 publications

Designing (the) politics of participation in science

Designing (the) politics of participation in science

Communications Revolution: from Civilizational Phenomenon to Science Communication Perspectives

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About