2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3201-0_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Galileo Affair, 1633–1992

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…118 Later, Galileo was even allowed to stay at the Tuscan embassy, rather than the offices of the Inquisition.…”
Section: The Ties That Bind: 1632-33mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…118 Later, Galileo was even allowed to stay at the Tuscan embassy, rather than the offices of the Inquisition.…”
Section: The Ties That Bind: 1632-33mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By this time, Galileo had been publicly denounced as a Copernican, 18 and there was speculation he would be condemned along with the doctrine he defended. Thus, when the Congregation of the Index of Prohibited Books published its decree censoring Copernicanism, 19 some feared Galileo would also be disgraced as a heretic. 20 Galileo himself was shaken, but not overly concerned.…”
Section: Establishing Ties: 1610-16mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a decree of February 1616, the Vatican censors judged two propositions in Copernicus's De revolutionibus orbium coelestium to be "erroneous in faith" and "formally heretical", namely that the sun is immovable at the centre of the world and that the earth moves around the sun. 77 As a consequence, Copernicus's De revolutionibus was placed on the Congregation's Index of Forbidden Books, "donec corrigatur". Galileo's name was not mentioned in the decree, but a few days after its publication, on 25 February 1616, the Pope ordered Cardinal Bellarmino to warn Galileo against openly defending censored opinions.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%