2018
DOI: 10.3847/2515-5172/aadc61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Gaia FGK Benchmark Stars Version 2.1*

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
79
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We made a comprehensive comparison of our T eff , log g, and [Fe/H] values with those of virtually all relevant determinations of stellar atmospheric parameters of FGK-type stars. Our parameter determinations are in good agreement with the literature values in general, particularly with the region of the parameter space covered by the YaPSI isochrones (Spada et al 2017) and the Gaia benchmark stars (Jofré et al 2014(Jofré et al , 2018. The scarcity of Fe ii lines in the NIR wavelength range covered by CARMENES prevented us from performing the stellar parameter determinations using this spectral region alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We made a comprehensive comparison of our T eff , log g, and [Fe/H] values with those of virtually all relevant determinations of stellar atmospheric parameters of FGK-type stars. Our parameter determinations are in good agreement with the literature values in general, particularly with the region of the parameter space covered by the YaPSI isochrones (Spada et al 2017) and the Gaia benchmark stars (Jofré et al 2014(Jofré et al , 2018. The scarcity of Fe ii lines in the NIR wavelength range covered by CARMENES prevented us from performing the stellar parameter determinations using this spectral region alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…10 but restricting the analysis to the Fe i and Fe ii lines found in the optical wavelength region covered by the VIS channel of CARMENES. Jofré et al (2018), can be found in Fig. 14. We find good agreement between our derived values and the fundamental T eff and log g, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We plot in Fig. 5 the obtained T eff and log g compared with the reference (Heiter et al 2015a;Jofré et al 2018) for each spectrum. We obtain a good agreement, with differences below 100 K and 0.1 dex in T eff and log g respectively, with however larger differences for the giants HD 107328, Vir and ξHya, especially for the surface gravity.…”
Section: Gaia Fgk Benchmark Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%