2018
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.tps7582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The GAIA (CLL13) trial: An international intergroup phase III study for frontline therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The side effects of FCR, such as hematological toxicity and infectious complications, are well documented [ 36 , 37 ], making it a feasible treatment choice only for young, fit patients because dose reductions in FCR, which are an often used approach to minimize the drug-related toxicity of FCR, result in reduced efficacy [ 38 , 39 ]. Although FCR is still a reasonable treatment option for a small proportion of CLL patients, recent trials such as the CLL-13 trial by the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG) [ 40 ] or the FLAIR trial [ 41 ] are challenging CIT and are probably shifting the standard of care to targeted agents even more. In addition, FCR had a higher mortality than expected in recent phase 3 trials [ 42 ].…”
Section: Chemoimmunotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The side effects of FCR, such as hematological toxicity and infectious complications, are well documented [ 36 , 37 ], making it a feasible treatment choice only for young, fit patients because dose reductions in FCR, which are an often used approach to minimize the drug-related toxicity of FCR, result in reduced efficacy [ 38 , 39 ]. Although FCR is still a reasonable treatment option for a small proportion of CLL patients, recent trials such as the CLL-13 trial by the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG) [ 40 ] or the FLAIR trial [ 41 ] are challenging CIT and are probably shifting the standard of care to targeted agents even more. In addition, FCR had a higher mortality than expected in recent phase 3 trials [ 42 ].…”
Section: Chemoimmunotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacy of venetoclax in younger, fit patients still needs to be proven. This question will probably be answered by the CLL13 trial (NCT02950051), which compares CIT (FCR or BR) vs. various combinations of venetoclax (Ve), rituximab (R), obinutuzumab (G) and ibrutinib (I) (RVe vs. GVe vs. GIVe) in treatment-naïve, fit CLL patients without del(17p) or TP53 mutation [ 40 ].…”
Section: Bcl2 Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All venetoclax regimens will be administered for 1-year. 18 An ongoing phase III trial (ECOG EA9161) will compare ibrutinib-obinutuzumab versus ibrutinib-obinutuzumab-venetoclax (for 19 cycles) in younger treatment-naïve patients [ ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03701282]. The phase III Alliance A041702 trial will similarly assess ibrutinib-obinutuzumab versus ibrutinib-obinutuzumab-venetoclax in previously untreated older patients with CLL.…”
Section: Novel Agents and Novel-novel Combinations Is Three Really Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase III CLL13 trial (GAIA), an international four arm study for physically fit patients, is testing chemotherapy-free frontline therapy for previously untreated patients without del(17p). The trial is fully enrolled and tested with standard chemotherapy (FCR/BR), venetoclax plus rituximab (RVe), venetoclax plus obinutuzumab (GVe) and venetoclax plus ibrutinib, and obinutuzumab (GIVe) with MRD and PFS as co-primary endpoints [80].…”
Section: Combination Trials Of Bcr Inhibitors and Bcl2 Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%