1999
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.19.9.5872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The G2 Checkpoint Is Maintained by Redundant Pathways

Abstract: While p53 activity is critical for a DNA damage-induced G(1) checkpoint, its role in the G(2) checkpoint has not been compelling because cells lacking p53 retain the ability to arrest in G(2) following DNA damage. Comparison between normal human foreskin fibroblasts (HFFs) and HFFs in which p53 was eliminated by transduction with human papillomavirus type 16 E6 showed that treatment with adriamycin initiated arrest in G(2) with active cyclin B/CDC2 kinase, regardless of p53 status. Both E6-transduced HFFs and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
84
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
7
84
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Centrosomal staining with an anti-PS133 signal together with an elevated Mpm2 signal in drugtreated E6 cells led us to conclude that these cells were not truly arrested in G2 phase but were in fact undergoing early mitotic events ( Figure 3D). This is in agreement with the observation that in drug-arrested E6 cells, cyclin B1-associated kinase activity, albeit weak in comparison with mitotic cells, is significantly higher than that of cyclin B1 complexes in G2-arrested wild-type NHFs (Dulic et al, 1998;Passalaris et al, 1999;Baus et al, 2003).…”
Section: Induction Of P21-cyclin B1-cdk1 Complexes After Dna Damagesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Centrosomal staining with an anti-PS133 signal together with an elevated Mpm2 signal in drugtreated E6 cells led us to conclude that these cells were not truly arrested in G2 phase but were in fact undergoing early mitotic events ( Figure 3D). This is in agreement with the observation that in drug-arrested E6 cells, cyclin B1-associated kinase activity, albeit weak in comparison with mitotic cells, is significantly higher than that of cyclin B1 complexes in G2-arrested wild-type NHFs (Dulic et al, 1998;Passalaris et al, 1999;Baus et al, 2003).…”
Section: Induction Of P21-cyclin B1-cdk1 Complexes After Dna Damagesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Centrosomal staining with an anti-PS133 signal together with an elevated Mpm2 signal in drugtreated E6 cells led us to conclude that these cells were not truly arrested in G2 phase but were in fact undergoing early mitotic events ( Figure 3D). This is in agreement with the observation that in drug-arrested E6 cells, cyclin B1-associated kinase activity, albeit weak in comparison with mitotic cells, is significantly higher than that of cyclin B1 complexes in G2-arrested wild-type NHFs (Dulic et al, 1998;Passalaris et al, 1999;Baus et al, 2003).To eliminate the possible contribution of other p53 (or E6) targets, we studied cyclin B1 localization in response to DNA damage (ICRF-193 and ␥-irradiation) in asynchronously growing p21 null fibroblasts (Wei et al, 2001). Unlike their wild-type counterparts (LF1), p21 Ϫ/Ϫ NHF failed to block pRb phosphorylation and efficiently inactivate cyclin B1-associated kinase activity in the presence of ICRF-193 (Figure 4, A and B), thus confirming our earlier observation in E6 cells (Baus et al, 2003).…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As previously reported in p53-positive cells after g-radiation (Bunz et al, 1998), p21 should directly block the cyclin B1-Cdc2 activity even after the depletion of Chk1 in ML-1 cells. The G 2 checkpoint of ML-1 cells should thus consist of p53-dependent and p53-independent pathways (Passalaris et al, 1999), and GM abrogates only the latter Geldanamycin-induced Chk1 depletion abrogates G 2 arrest K Sugimoto et al pathway(s). In contrast, intra-S phase arrest elicited by cytarabine or gemcitabine seems to be dependent almost solely on Chk1 even in ML-1 cells, and therefore readily abrogated by GM (Arlander et al, 2003;Mesa et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings in the present study that genetic instability, as exemplified by Her-2/neu amplification, c-myc amplification, and gross aneuploidy, occurs almost exclusively in nonlobular breast tumors, draw attention to the role that p53 dysfunction might play in the development of structural and/or numerical chromosomal abnormalities in non-lobular breast cancers. Studies in experimental systems have demonstrated a relationship between the loss of wild type p53 function and the development of structural chromosomal abnormalities (49) including gene amplification (50,51), loss of pre-, intra-, and post-mitotic checkpoint control (52,53), endoreduplication (52), unequal chromosome segregation at mitosis due to centrosome abnormalities (54) and the development of tetraploidy and gross aneuploidy (49,50). The finding that excess mdm2 also leads to centrosome hyperamplification and to numerical chromosomal instability (55) lends further support to a causal relationship between loss of wild type p53 function and chromosomal instability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%