2020
DOI: 10.3390/cells9030622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor (GPER) Expression Correlates with Pro-Metastatic Pathways in ER-Negative Breast Cancer: A Bioinformatics Analysis

Abstract: The G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER, formerly known as GPR30) is a seven-transmembrane receptor that mediates estrogen signals in both normal and malignant cells. In particular, GPER has been involved in the activation of diverse signaling pathways toward transcriptional and biological responses that characterize the progression of breast cancer (BC). In this context, a correlation between GPER expression and worse clinical-pathological features of BC has been suggested, although controversial data h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this vein, immunohistochemical studies showed that GPER levels are positively associated with tumor size, distant metastases, and recurrence in BC specimens and inversely correlated with disease-free survival in tamoxifentreated patients (Filardo et al, 2006;Liu et al, 2009;Ignatov et al, 2011). A recent bioinformatics analysis in ER-negative BCs has endorsed the aforementioned findings, proving that high GPER levels are both linked with promigratory and metastatic genes and positively correlated with a shorter disease-free interval (Talia et al, 2020). Nevertheless, some studies have reported a tumor suppressor function of GPER (WeiƟenborn et al, 2014;Martin et al, 2018), warranting further investigations in order to better appreciate the role of GPER in different cancer cell contexts.…”
Section: Estrogen Signalingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this vein, immunohistochemical studies showed that GPER levels are positively associated with tumor size, distant metastases, and recurrence in BC specimens and inversely correlated with disease-free survival in tamoxifentreated patients (Filardo et al, 2006;Liu et al, 2009;Ignatov et al, 2011). A recent bioinformatics analysis in ER-negative BCs has endorsed the aforementioned findings, proving that high GPER levels are both linked with promigratory and metastatic genes and positively correlated with a shorter disease-free interval (Talia et al, 2020). Nevertheless, some studies have reported a tumor suppressor function of GPER (WeiƟenborn et al, 2014;Martin et al, 2018), warranting further investigations in order to better appreciate the role of GPER in different cancer cell contexts.…”
Section: Estrogen Signalingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As mentioned, the only estrogen membrane receptor known so far is GPER, a seven transmembrane G-protein coupled receptor, which is involved in the modulation of signaling processes that promote tumor growth both in vitro and in vivo [ 33 , 34 , 35 ]. Its expression is correlated to increased tumor size, distant metastasis, tumor recurrence [ 36 , 37 ], and expression of pro-metastatic genes in ER-negative breast tumors [ 38 ]. All of these properties make it a promising therapeutic target for treating different types of tumors [ 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that ERĪ² exerts antagonist effects on ERĪ± mediated stimulation in cell proliferation (Covaleda et al, 2008; Strom et al, 2004; Thomas & Gustafsson, 2011). GPER1 is associated with transcriptional and biological responses driving the progression of breast cancer as proā€migratory and metastatic genes belonging to cell adhesion molecules, triggers diverse transduction pathways including the epidermal growth factor receptor, phosphatidylinositol 3ā€kinase/protein kinase B, and mitogenā€activated protein kinases toward (Talia et al, 2020). In male, higher estrogen levels have been related with better cognitive performance (Kulkarni, Gavrilidis, Worsley, van Rheenen, & Hayes, 2013).…”
Section: Structural Similarity To Estrogenmentioning
confidence: 99%