2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The fuzzy ontology reasoner fuzzyDL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fuzzy data can be manipulated, according to Bobillo and Straccia (), using fuzzy logic operations such as conjunction, disjunction, negation, and implication. These operators do not behave in the same way as in a classic logic, even several authors have given different interpretations to them, such as Łukasiewicz (Giles, ), Gödel (Bobillo, Delgado, & Gómez‐Romero, ), and Zadeh ().…”
Section: Our Proposal: Fuzzy‐dl For Supporting the Rehabilitation Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fuzzy data can be manipulated, according to Bobillo and Straccia (), using fuzzy logic operations such as conjunction, disjunction, negation, and implication. These operators do not behave in the same way as in a classic logic, even several authors have given different interpretations to them, such as Łukasiewicz (Giles, ), Gödel (Bobillo, Delgado, & Gómez‐Romero, ), and Zadeh ().…”
Section: Our Proposal: Fuzzy‐dl For Supporting the Rehabilitation Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can be assigned by using different membership functions such as trapezoidal function, triangular function, left shoulder function, crisp function, linear function, and right shoulder function (see some examples in Table 6). Fuzzy data can be manipulated, according to Bobillo and Straccia (2016), using fuzzy logic operations such as conjunction, disjunction, negation, and implication. These operators do not behave in the same way as in a classic logic, even several authors have given different interpretations to them, such as Łukasiewicz (Giles, 1976), Gödel (Bobillo, Delgado, & Gómez-Romero, 2012), and Zadeh (1965).…”
Section: Fuzzy-dl For Supporting the Rehabilitation Of The Elderlymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, there is a lot of work going on regarding the development of the semantic web. Recent research is concerned with the development of vague description logics [2]. The creation of vague description logics that deal with qualitative spatial representation and reasoning has been studied and implemented for the semantic web [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OWL [220] and its successor OWL 2 [81,221] are standard W3C languages for defining and instantiating Web ontologies whose logical counterpart are classical DLs. So far, several fuzzy extensions of DLs exists and some fuzzy DL reasoners have been implemented, such as fuzzyDL [21,41], DeLorean [16], Fire [115,253], SoftFacts [284], GURDL [125], GERDS [126], YADLR [157], FRESG [312] and DLMedia [283,299]. Not surprisingly, each reasoner uses its own fuzzy DL language for representing fuzzy ontologies and, thus, there is a need for a standard way to represent such information.…”
Section: Fuzzy Dlsmentioning
confidence: 99%