The Future of the English Language

Kennedy, Arthur G.

doi:10.2307/3181898

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In The Modern English Verb-Adverb Combination (1920), the first book devoted solely to phrasal verbs, A. G. Kennedy takes a surprisingly low view of his subject: ‘[t]he development of these combinations is essentially a process of the common, relatively uneducated, mind’ (1920: 40), and ‘much of the usage [of phrasal verbs] is a result of linguistic laziness’ (1920: 44). In a later article, he deplores the ‘growing avoidance of many special verbs such as recover “to get over,” exhaust “to use up,” examine “to look over,” […] this disuse of such verbs threatens to cut down the active vocabulary of English very materially during the next few generations’ (1933: 6). Although Kennedy does not specify the reasons for his preference, it is evident that the ‘special’ verbs ( recover , exhaust, examine ) are Latinate.…”

Section: Common and Uneducated?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Phrasal verbs: ‘a process of the common, relatively uneducated, mind’?

Wild¹

2011

English Today

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

If you look through a modern guide to English usage, you will probably find that it has something to say about phrasal verbs. It might be a warning not to use certain phrasal verbs in certain contexts. For example, Allen (2005: 181–90) offers a table of ‘more formal alternatives to those phrasal verbs that can sometimes be too informal for writing’, with suggestions for replacing sum up with conclude and step down with resign, among others. In many cases, it will be a warning about phrasal verbs where the adverbial particle adds little semantic content to the verb: The Chicago Manual of Style advises writers to ‘avoid the phrasal verb if the verb alone conveys essentially the same meaning – e.g. rest up is equivalent to rest’ (2003: 174). It might attribute such usages to American English, as in Evans' (2000: 54–5) comment that phrasal verbs such as win out, stop off and check up on, which ‘grow like toadstools’, are ‘American parasites’. It might be a positive comment, such as Bryson's note that phrasal verbs are ‘one of the most versatile features of English’, but if so, it will probably be qualified: Bryson adds that in many cases the added particles ‘are merely a sign of careless writing’ (Bryson, 2002: 156–7). What is it about phrasal verbs that provokes such comments? By examining grammars, usage books, dictionaries and other materials since the eighteenth century, I will discuss changing attitudes towards phrasal verbs and how they fit into the context of broader opinions about language.

show abstract

Section: Common and Uneducated?mentioning

confidence: 99%