2016
DOI: 10.1080/00336297.2016.1181556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Future of Sport Philosophy in Higher Education Kinesiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, the philosophy of sport could also benefit from paying renewed and systematic attention to issues related to the broader social, political, ideological, and economic context in which sport and physical activity are organized and practiced. This highlights a claim made by Hopsicker and Hochstetler (2016), that "there is no indication that the philosophic examination of sport and physical activity is needed less today than at any point in its history"; if anything, "evidence from both inside and outside of the academy suggests otherwise" (p. 247). This resonates with Park's (1981) conclusion in her chapter for Brooks's anthology.…”
Section: Responding To the Changing Nature Of Global Sport And Physical Activitymentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this regard, the philosophy of sport could also benefit from paying renewed and systematic attention to issues related to the broader social, political, ideological, and economic context in which sport and physical activity are organized and practiced. This highlights a claim made by Hopsicker and Hochstetler (2016), that "there is no indication that the philosophic examination of sport and physical activity is needed less today than at any point in its history"; if anything, "evidence from both inside and outside of the academy suggests otherwise" (p. 247). This resonates with Park's (1981) conclusion in her chapter for Brooks's anthology.…”
Section: Responding To the Changing Nature Of Global Sport And Physical Activitymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…What has been explained so far in this section, but more precisely in the whole article, leaves us with a significant question: what does the future of the philosophy of sport look like? Hopsicker and Hochstetler (2016) addressed this question in a recent article. After reviewing the status of the philosophy of sport, they analyzed past prognoses offered by various scholars, including ourselves.…”
Section: Current Issues In and Future Directions For The Philosophy Of Sportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars argue that the field of PE and sport pedagogy need broader concepts of moving capabilities and learning (e.g. Hopsicker and Hochstetler 2016;Kretchmar 2000Kretchmar , 2017Tinning 2009) as well as projects that on the base of such concepts can carry out empirical studies in novel ways (Shilling 2018;Allen-Collinson 2009;Brown and Payne 2009). To some degree, empirical studies that focus on assessment (Lloyd 2015), discourse (Larsson and Nyberg 2017) and conception (Svennberg 2017;Backman and Larsson 2016) have challenged certain views of movement and learning and how we understand the classroom practice of PE teachers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the variety of arguments and different problematisations, the question at the heart of each article was how to save the discipline. Hopsicker and Hochstetler (2016), for example, problematised the marginalisation of philosophy as a discipline in the larger field of sport sciences (Kinesiology) and argued for sport philosophy sub-discipline to be revamped and evolve along with sport sciences itself, taking a more central role within the discipline of sport sciences. They also commented on the word 'sport', drawing attention to its limitations as a concept within the discipline as a whole.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also commented on the word 'sport', drawing attention to its limitations as a concept within the discipline as a whole. They, however, conceded that a name change might be a step in the wrong direction which can jeopardise the existence of the whole discipline (Hopsicker & Hochstetler, 2016). In the same issue, Block (2016) delineated several critical matters facing higher education as a whole, namely corporatisation of universities, risk to academic freedom and compromised intellectual integrity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%