The future of responsible innovation

Bessant, John; Iakovleva, Tatiana; Oftedal, Elin Merethe

doi:10.4337/9781788975063.00022

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This study builds upon previous research demonstrating that responsible innovation and the inclusion of diverse stakeholders are effective in improving healthcare services (18,22,(24)(25)(26). Our primary aim is to describe and analyze an inclusive innovation process for the responsible coordination of municipal health and care services for individuals with mental illness.…”

mentioning

confidence: 72%

Responsible coordination of municipal health and care services: Café dialogues as a method for responsible innovation

Skjærpe,

Iakovleva,

Storm

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Care coordination is crucial to ensure and improve the health of individuals with mental illness. This study aimed to describe and analyze an inclusive innovation process that could contribute to the responsible coordination of municipal health and care services. Method Café dialogues were performed to explore the perspectives of professionals and service users regarding care coordination. Further, we used a responsible innovation framework to analyze the innovation process. Results Factors supporting responsible coordination at the individual level comprised service users knowing the professionals working with them, personalized healthcare services, and access to meaningful activities. At the provider level, key factors were effective coordination routines, communication, information exchange, and professionals being familiar with each other. Results reflect professionals' and service users' perspectives on efficient care coordination, existing challenges, and measures to improve care coordination. Conclusion Café dialogues can be an inclusive method for innovation and can inform responsible coordination of municipal health and care services for individuals with mental illness. The impact of these measures on the improvement and responsible coordination of municipal health and care services should be explored.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 72%

Responsible coordination of municipal health and care services: Café dialogues as a method for responsible innovation

Skjærpe,

Iakovleva,

Storm

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The need-solution interaction enables a solution landscape of a pool of need-related information. It allows to keep the design space of the innovation process open as long as possible and to pivot and adapt towards the changing stakeholders' and users' needs (Bessant et al, 2019).…”

Section: Innovation and Problem Solvingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Governing digital innovations for responsible outcomes – the case of digital healthcare and welfare services

Thapa

Iakovleva

2023

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital innovations integrated with Responsible innovation (RI) offer great potential to address complex societal challenges in the healthcare and welfare sector but depend on how well firms can manage the innovation process to ensure socially desirable solutions. However, there is a lack of empirical studies examining whether RI principles can be integrated into a firm’s innovation development process. This paper aims to fill this gap through longitudinal case studies of six digital start-ups in the healthcare and welfare sector from 2016 to 2019. We followed innovation development in these firms, observing the stakeholder inclusion, pivotal moments and the emergence of new solutions based on the need-solution interactions. We found that stakeholder inclusion is critical. Therefore, we suggest that managers and entrepreneurs consider including a diversity of stakeholders and users from the design phase throughout the innovation process.

show abstract

“…The notion of responsibility has long been debated across disciplines, including philosophy and philosophy of science (Douglas, 2003; Mitcham, 2003; Vincent, 2011; Young, 2011), sociology (Hage & Eckersley, 2012; O'Mahony, 2015; Pellizzoni, 2004; Strydom, 1999), human geography (Massey, 2004; Noxolo et al, 2012; Walker, 1997), and Science and Technology Studies (Arnaldi & Bianchi, 2016; Glerup & Horst, 2014; Owen et al, 2013; Sarewitz, 2006). There exist micro‐level case studies of what responsibility means in and for research and communication (Donner, 2017; Getson et al, 2021; Porter & Dessai, 2017).…”

Section: Science Responsibility and Activismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Leaking the IPCC: A question of responsibility?

Hartz

2022

WIREs Climate Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In August 2021, while the world was grappling with the release of the IPCC WGI report, a group of activist scientists called Scientist Rebellion leaked parts of the Working Group III contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) prior to intergovernmental approval. Although Scientist Rebellion are not the first to leak an IPCC report, they are the most vocal leaker with a particular political agenda: to generate disruptive climate action by curtailing the carefully orchestrated intergovernmental process of the IPCC. I take this case of science in activism involving the IPCC interface as an example to examine the increasingly intricate relationship between science, activism and responsibility. The salient sense of urgency around climate action, the growing prevalence of the climate crisis narrative in both public and scientific spheres, and the increased policy‐relevance of science‐policy interfaces put strong pressures on (climate) scientists that need to be disentangled to be understood without premature judgment. I show that the leak is symptomatic of the novel responsibility to act(ivism) scientists are increasingly confronted with and I highlight some of the tensions that come with this responsibility. Emphasizing the centrality of the question of responsibility in, and of, science, I discuss the (ir)responsibility of leaking IPCC draft materials. I end on a call for more interdisciplinary attentiveness to the nexus of science, activism and responsibility and the cases in which they become entangled. This article is categorized under: The Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Climate Science and Social Movements The Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Knowledge and Practice The Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Climate Science and Decision Making

show abstract

The future of responsible innovation

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Responsible coordination of municipal health and care services: Café dialogues as a method for responsible innovation

Responsible coordination of municipal health and care services: Café dialogues as a method for responsible innovation

Governing digital innovations for responsible outcomes – the case of digital healthcare and welfare services

Leaking the IPCC: A question of responsibility?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About