The future of public administration research: An editor's perspective

Abstract

Research in the field of public administration has changed and advanced significantly in recent years. These advancements concern both how we engage in research-such as the methods we apply, the interdisciplinary nature of the theories we use, and the research questions we ask. Increasingly, we are witnessing a shift in public-sector values away from efficiency and effectiveness and toward a paradigm that highlights equity. In this article, we reflect on these changes from our position as editors-in-chief of some of the leading journals in the field. In addition to describing the progress of this discipline, we explore emerging windows of opportunity for new research. One such window is research on ways to incorporate interdisciplinary perspectives and methods. We also see the need for work in such areas as social equity, comparative administration, artificial intelligence, and climate change. Finally, we argue for a more proactive approach in disseminating research to those involved in the day-to-day decision-making processes of public organizations. | INTRODUCTIONThe role of public administration emerged with the development of the first formal governments. In ancient Egypt, pharaohs deployed servants to do their bidding and tax collectors to find and manage the flow of resources (El Baradei, 2021;Ferlie et al., 2005). The first concerted effort to improve public management practices occurred in

Administrative characteristics and timing of governments' crisis responses: A global study of early reactions to COVID‐19

“…Although comparative and more inclusive approaches are increasingly advocated in PA (Bertelli et al, 2020 ; McDonald III et al, 2022 ; Van der Wal, Mussagulova, & Chen, 2021a ; Van der Wal, van den Berg, & Haque, 2021b ), research remains dominated by single case (country, municipality, agency) studies. The same applies to research on crisis management and responses to COVID‐19.…”

“…Especially in developing countries, governments with a separate ministry of health adopted binding containment measures faster, relative to the first domestic COVID case, than others. This illustrates that context matters for performance (McDonald III et al, 2022 ; O'Toole Jr. & Meier, 2017 ), also in crisis management. Findings also suggest that countries with more hierarchical administrative traditions, such as socialist and to a lesser degree Germanic and Napoleonic, adopted some mandatory interventions like school closures faster than those with a more liberal Anglo‐American tradition.…”

The future of public sector accounting research. A polyphonic debate

“…However, this line of thinking treats perceived opportunity for participation as an equaliser, forgetting that many people experience barriers to engagement. In their article on the important questions for public administration research, however, McDonald et al (2022) included social equity budgeting as one of the critical challenges that we must address. For our research to move forward, they argue, we must acknowledge the shortcomings of the past and accept the challenges of the future.…”

When public administration education switches online: Student perceptions during COVID-19

“…Second, the research design of our paper (which will be mentioned in the next paragraph and articulated in the Methods section) injects an additional layer of nuance in terms of whether and to what extent perceptions of online public administration education could differ by the way in which it is planned. Third, by conducting the survey in an Asian context, the paper helps fill a critical gap in the literature related to policy administration education in Asia (Ginn and Hammond, 2012; Mukherjee and Maurya, 2022) while making a timely addition to the literature on non-Western public administration more generally (McDonald et al, 2022; Yan et al, 2022). Lastly, on a practical dimension, our findings can help improve existing online education practices in public administration institutions as a response to the ongoing pandemic, and offer continuing guidance on the direction of online education in the post-pandemic era.…”