Companion Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Systems, Programming, Languages and Applications: Sof 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2814189.2818719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Future of Programming Languages and Programmers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Programming language popularity has been shown to be hardly related to its internal characteristics [11,23], rather its application area or business environment [7]. Also, the programming habits and thought-shaping that programming paradigms can have, have been analysed in the context of paradigm change [34], but not so much for the possible benefits of maintaining their guidelines regardless of the particular implementation (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Programming language popularity has been shown to be hardly related to its internal characteristics [11,23], rather its application area or business environment [7]. Also, the programming habits and thought-shaping that programming paradigms can have, have been analysed in the context of paradigm change [34], but not so much for the possible benefits of maintaining their guidelines regardless of the particular implementation (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the learning outcomes of a course in programming languages are well established (Adams et al, 2006;Pombrio et al, 2017), the most effective approach to teaching a language course is not a settled matter. There are a myriad of interpreter-based (Friedman et al, 2001;Queinnec, 2003;Krishnamurthi, 2012), survey-based (Louden, 2002;Scott, 2009;Sebesta, 2015), and other approaches (Kumar, 2005;Adams et al, 2006;Fraser et al, 2015;Lee, 2015;Lewis et al, 2016). Over the past 14 years, we have tried various approaches toward teaching programming languages, including the two predominant approaches-the comparative/survey approach and the interpreter approach-which both involve challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%