2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-011-1225-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The future of MSK interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may reflect the greater familiarity of current musculoskeletal radiologists with established procedures such as biopsies and steroid injections, which have been in the radiologist's armory since as early as the late 1950s following the development of the trephine needle. [11] On the other hand, vertebral fracture treatment has long relied on open surgery; minimally invasive vertebroplasty was first performed recently in 1984, and sacroplasty was first described just two decades ago. [12,13] The relative novelty of vertebral augmentation combined with its commonality to both spinal surgeons' and radiologists' caseloads, and availability of appropriate facilities limited to tertiary centers may explain the low prevalence among our sample of interventional musculoskeletal radiologists performing these.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may reflect the greater familiarity of current musculoskeletal radiologists with established procedures such as biopsies and steroid injections, which have been in the radiologist's armory since as early as the late 1950s following the development of the trephine needle. [11] On the other hand, vertebral fracture treatment has long relied on open surgery; minimally invasive vertebroplasty was first performed recently in 1984, and sacroplasty was first described just two decades ago. [12,13] The relative novelty of vertebral augmentation combined with its commonality to both spinal surgeons' and radiologists' caseloads, and availability of appropriate facilities limited to tertiary centers may explain the low prevalence among our sample of interventional musculoskeletal radiologists performing these.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%