2020
DOI: 10.1080/20013078.2020.1809766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The future of Extracellular Vesicles as Theranostics – an ISEV meeting report

Abstract: The utilization of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in clinical theranostics has rapidly advanced in the past decade. In November 2018, the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) held a workshop on “EVs in Clinical Theranostic”. Here, we report the conclusions of roundtable discussions on the current advancement in the analysis technologies and we provide some guidelines to researchers in the field to consider the use of EVs in clinical application. The main challenges and the requirements for EV … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
92
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
1
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…injection, they were functionalized with PEG 18,38,45 . Although PEGylation of EVs reduced their uptake by B16.F10 cells compared to uncoated EVs (Figure 3) which has been previously shown in other studies 46 , the preferential uptake of PEG-functionalized EVs by 4-fold (Figure 3) compared to the uptake of PEG-coated liposomes highlighted their increased tumor cell specificity mediated by lipid and protein (eg, integrins, tetraspanins, glycoproteins) interactions which play a major role in EV intratumor biodistribution and uptake 47,48 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…injection, they were functionalized with PEG 18,38,45 . Although PEGylation of EVs reduced their uptake by B16.F10 cells compared to uncoated EVs (Figure 3) which has been previously shown in other studies 46 , the preferential uptake of PEG-functionalized EVs by 4-fold (Figure 3) compared to the uptake of PEG-coated liposomes highlighted their increased tumor cell specificity mediated by lipid and protein (eg, integrins, tetraspanins, glycoproteins) interactions which play a major role in EV intratumor biodistribution and uptake 47,48 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…To identify EV membrane proteins potentially involved in the preferential EV uptake as well as specific uptake by recipient cells, ToppGene and FunRich functional enrichment analysis highlighted that a majority of these proteins were associated with specific cellular uptake mediated by receptor or co-receptor activity delineating their importance for EV internalization via exogenous protein binding (Table 1, Figure 4C and D). Tetraspanins and integrins are ubiquitous surface molecules associated with EV uptake and exosome homing to specific tissues 10,48 . In MS data we identified several such proteins as for example the tetraspanins 3, -4, -6, -9, and -14, CD9, CD63, CD82, CD109, CD151, and the integrins β1, α -4, -5, -V, -6x1A, -9 (Supplementary file S1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…uEV analysis can be focused on physical parameters (e.g., concentration, size distribution, morphology) and/or the biochemical content of uEVs (e.g., proteins, nucleic acids, lipids and metabolites). This is reflected by the wealth of state of the art and newly emerging EV assays and analysis technologies available (Hartjes et al., 2019; Nazarenko, 2020; Paisrisarn et al., 2020; Skotland et al., 2020; Soekmadji et al., 2020; Williams et al., 2019).…”
Section: Recommendations and Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, studies characterizing EV glycosylation profiles of healthy individuals and cancer patients resorting to high-resolution methods are a need to identify potential novel cancer biomarkers. As an important remark, the standardization of current EV isolation/characterization protocols across the world remains a milestone to uniformize and ensure the reproducibility of studies conducted in the field, especially those aiming to be translated into the clinical setting [ 222 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%