1997
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8543.00057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Future of Employee Representation

Abstract: This article examines the future of employee interest representation in Britain against the broader European background. An attempt is made to define the character of interest representation in terms of the concepts of autonomy, legitimacy and efficacy. The core section of the article discusses recent and current developments with a focus on five themes: the level, structure, process, agenda and outcome of representation. A brief conclusion considers alternative scenarios and policy issues for employee represe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
153
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
153
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We draw on available literature to defi ne internal resources and capacities as a leadership strong enough and able to provide a vision and defi ne goals (Visser 1995;Ost 2009); identity which helps to shape unions' perception of choices, threats and opportunities (Hyman 1994(Hyman , 2001Hunt et al 1994); legitimacy or the compatibility of union goals and action with workers' demands (Hyman 1997); organizing capacity that ensures the ability to perform the expected tasks (Visser 1995); and union structures or the features of horizontal and vertical organization of unions (e.g. the extent of fragmentation, the mode of interaction with other unions), as well as the quality of links to political parties and other external actors (Avdagic 2005;Esping-Andersen and Korpi 1984;Higgins 1985).…”
Section: Strategy Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We draw on available literature to defi ne internal resources and capacities as a leadership strong enough and able to provide a vision and defi ne goals (Visser 1995;Ost 2009); identity which helps to shape unions' perception of choices, threats and opportunities (Hyman 1994(Hyman , 2001Hunt et al 1994); legitimacy or the compatibility of union goals and action with workers' demands (Hyman 1997); organizing capacity that ensures the ability to perform the expected tasks (Visser 1995); and union structures or the features of horizontal and vertical organization of unions (e.g. the extent of fragmentation, the mode of interaction with other unions), as well as the quality of links to political parties and other external actors (Avdagic 2005;Esping-Andersen and Korpi 1984;Higgins 1985).…”
Section: Strategy Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, Munro (2001: 454) calls for a new feminist union agenda which includes 'sensitivity to diversity' and gives more attention to the interests of working-class and black women. Hyman's (1997) analysis offers some further elaboration, recognizing the way in which interests as citizens, as well as more personalized life-style concerns, are forming part (or should form part) of union representation. Despite their mixed record historically on tackling inequalities and their weakened position in much of Europe, unions in some countries are now more comfortable with an equality agenda which recognizes elements of difference.…”
Section: Setting the Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partnership has been criticised as a confusing idea because it offers little in the way of direction. Debates have raged in the United Kingdom over the meaning of partnership, which has been described as 'all things to all people' (Hyman, 1997;Kelly, 1998;Kelly, 1999). There are a number of competing definitions.…”
Section: Partnership Lacks Claritymentioning
confidence: 99%