2017
DOI: 10.1086/689700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Future of Education for All as a Global Regime of Educational Governance

Abstract: General rightsThis document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/pure/about/ebr-terms 1The Future of Education for All as a Global Regime of Educational Governance 1 AbstractThe article critically considers the future of Education for All (EFA) understood as a global regime of educational governance. The article sets out an understanding of global governance, world ord… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
20
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Tikly (), reflects on the EFA movement and the formulation of SDG4, depicting this as a form of global governance, in which a group of powerful actors engaged in a process of building and maintaining legitimacy. He shows how the formulation of principles, norms, rules and decision‐making procedures around EFA had the effect of generating particular discourses which accommodated tensions and contradictions within and between economic, socio‐cultural and political perspectives.…”
Section: Developing Sdg4: the Politics Of Quality And Equalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tikly (), reflects on the EFA movement and the formulation of SDG4, depicting this as a form of global governance, in which a group of powerful actors engaged in a process of building and maintaining legitimacy. He shows how the formulation of principles, norms, rules and decision‐making procedures around EFA had the effect of generating particular discourses which accommodated tensions and contradictions within and between economic, socio‐cultural and political perspectives.…”
Section: Developing Sdg4: the Politics Of Quality And Equalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conflict hinged on narrow versus broad conceptions of these terms and the institutional histories of different organisations and governments, which supported different interpretations. Tikly () identifies areas of tension around EFA, and these are evident in many of the discussions associated with the formulation of the SDG4 targets at the eight moments outlined above. The contestation between the narrow and the broad approach to quality and equalities are evident in:…”
Section: Developing Sdg4: the Politics Of Quality And Equalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Esta renovada agenda nace respaldada por un proceso de diálogo intenso y de un acuerdo amplio entre diversidad de instituciones y actores (UNESCO, 2014; que refleja un nuevo régimen de gobierno educativo global sustentado en las ideas fuerza de aprendizaje para todos y todas, y de educación para el desarrollo sostenible (Tikly, 2017). Esencialmente destacamos cinco atributos fundamentales de la misma.…”
Section: La Agenda Educativa 2030 Como Ventana De Oportunidadesunclassified
“…I used purposeful sampling to narrow down documents, reports, policy briefs, and other written artifacts produced by these actors that are widely referenced within the policy network, in recognition of the constructive power of ideas in policy-making but also the politics of knowledge production and dissemination (Verger, Fontdevila, et al, 2016). Although global policy documents have often failed to promote actual action, such as those associated with Education for All, they are still resources that contribute to establishing and maintaining the legitimacy of a global regime of governance (Tikly, 2017). These documents also capture the process of change in hegemonic discourses governing policies and action surrounding refugee education.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%