2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41928-023-00926-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The future of brain–machine interfaces is optical

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brain-machine interfaces. Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) [ 190 ] are poised to play a crucial role in the diagnosis of neurological disorders in the future. BMIs, through direct interaction with signals from the brain, hold the potential to identify diseases related to the nervous system, such as Parkinson’s disease or stroke.…”
Section: Challenges and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain-machine interfaces. Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) [ 190 ] are poised to play a crucial role in the diagnosis of neurological disorders in the future. BMIs, through direct interaction with signals from the brain, hold the potential to identify diseases related to the nervous system, such as Parkinson’s disease or stroke.…”
Section: Challenges and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 46 Thus future BMIs are likely to be optics-based. 47 We will begin by outlining the experiments that have been realized with the current two-photon BMI (2p-BMI).…”
Section: Brain Machine Interfaces Using In Vivo Mu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If such a system could learn to provide appropriate feedback reflecting the brain state in real time, it could suppress epileptic seizures and replace deep brain stimulation for treating Parkinson’s disease. 47 Moreover, it could also extend the function of the brain, as foretold in science fiction novels.…”
Section: Interaction Of Brain and Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, how should the treating therapist characterize her confidential relationship with Sarah in this context, and are there novel or difficult-to-define harms that she may be subject to? If the rudimentary telepathic connection Sarah and her partner share advances further, in line with recent brain-to-brain interfaces, 11 would the therapist be treating with Sarah, or Sarah and her (physically absent) partner? More radically, how much of Sarah's sensory, cognitive, and emotional information does she need to directly share with her partner before her mind becomes-in some clinically relevant sense-merged with her partner's mind?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%