2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The future of blood‐based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease

Abstract: Treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is significantly hampered by the lack of easily accessible biomarkers that can detect disease presence and predict disease risk reliably. Fluid biomarkers of AD currently provide indications of disease stage; however, they are not robust predictors of disease progression or treatment response, and most are measured in cerebrospinal fluid, which limits their applicability. With these aspects in mind, the aim of this article is to underscore the concerted efforts of the Bloo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
224
0
15

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
0
224
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Since blood is a biofluid much more easily reached and manageable than CSF, searching for consistent blood-borne biomarkers is needed. In this connection, the Blood-Based Biomarker Interest Group (BBBIG), an international working group of leading AD scientists from academia and industry, has been established to scrutinize the present scenario and to support the progress in the field (see Henriksen et al (2013) for a critical perspective on the status of blood-based biomarkers for AD [13]). …”
Section: Blood Prospective Candidate Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since blood is a biofluid much more easily reached and manageable than CSF, searching for consistent blood-borne biomarkers is needed. In this connection, the Blood-Based Biomarker Interest Group (BBBIG), an international working group of leading AD scientists from academia and industry, has been established to scrutinize the present scenario and to support the progress in the field (see Henriksen et al (2013) for a critical perspective on the status of blood-based biomarkers for AD [13]). …”
Section: Blood Prospective Candidate Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, significant indications on the existing state of the biomedicine on candidate markers of AD resulting from multiple analytical platforms -encompassing (I) structural/functional/metabolic neuroimaging modalities, (II) neurochemistry methods based on CSF and blood (plasma/serum) examination, (III) neurogenetic analyses, and (IV) procedures for cognitive and functional assessment -have been supplied [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, statistics show an exponential rise in the number of cases with the disease. These findings emphasize the enormous and urgent need for develop an effective treatments [44]. Due to the complexity of the disease and increasing of population with advanced age, AD is the public health crisis of the 21 st century [45] and the current pharmacological therapies provide symptomatic improvement alone.…”
Section: Ad Treatment: Amaryllidaceae Alkaloidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In AD patients, the accumulated tau proteins are the principal elements of NFT and a major indication for immunohistochemical or biochemical revealing in the central nervous system because it is associated with the complexity of dementia [55] . The presence of these tau proteins therefore, has been examined in biological fluids and peripheral tissues in order to identify an ideal AD marker to use it as an ideal diagnostic tool.…”
Section: Tau Protein As Biological Markermentioning
confidence: 99%