2011
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The fusiform response to faces: Explicit versus implicit processing of emotion

Abstract: Regions of the fusiform gyrus (FG) respond preferentially to faces over other classes of visual stimuli. It remains unclear whether emotional face information modulates FG activity. In the present study, whole-head magnetoencephalography (MEG) was obtained from fifteen healthy adults who viewed emotionally expressive faces and made button responses based upon emotion (explicit condition) or age (implicit condition). Dipole source modeling produced source waveforms for left and right primary visual and left and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(172 reference statements)
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the strength of functional coupling of these regions during reappraisal (versus look‐negative) was found to be negatively associated with age, highlighting the possibility that such feed‐forward modulation may be greater among younger participants. The role of the fusiform gyrus in reappraisal is also consistent with the use of complex social images in our task, which overwhelmingly contained human faces [Kawasaki et al, ; Monroe et al, ; Vrtička et al, ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Indeed, the strength of functional coupling of these regions during reappraisal (versus look‐negative) was found to be negatively associated with age, highlighting the possibility that such feed‐forward modulation may be greater among younger participants. The role of the fusiform gyrus in reappraisal is also consistent with the use of complex social images in our task, which overwhelmingly contained human faces [Kawasaki et al, ; Monroe et al, ; Vrtička et al, ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Because adolescence is an important period for social cognitive processing (Blakemore & Mills, 2014), it is plausible that individuals are more sensitive to their mothers' perspective following a brief instance of misbehavior. Indeed, the TPJ, mPPC, and dmPFC are implicated in perspective taking and mentalizing processes (Blakemore & Mills, 2014), while the fusiform is involved in processing social and emotional salience (Van Bavel, Packer & Cunningham, 2011;McRae, Gross, Weber, Robertson, Sokol-Hessner et al, 2012;Monroe, Griffin, Pinkham, Loughead, Gur et al, 2013), suggesting that adolescents may be processing their risky choices while in the presence of their mothers as a more socially salient event. More broadly, these findings can help address how brain regions involved in social cognitive processes are implicated in decision-making processes and risk-taking contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To cope with this issue, a recent approach has been proposed in [56]. It consists of erasing segments of time series which are corrupted by very large head movements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%