2017
DOI: 10.5269/bspm.v37i3.34198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Funk-Hecke formula, harmonic polynomials, and derivatives of radial distributions

Abstract: We give a version of the Funk-Hecke formula that holds with minimal assumptons and apply it to obtain formulas for the distributional derivatives of radial distributions in R n of the typewhere Y k is a harmonic homogeneous polynomial. We show that such derivatives have simpler expressions than those of the form p ∇ (f (r)) for a general polynomial p.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that this delta part is in fact a spherical delta part 9. Naturally, when k − n = 2m ≥ 0, the projection of the thick delta part is precisely the distributional delta part, and this agrees with[36, (7.7)].…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notice that this delta part is in fact a spherical delta part 9. Naturally, when k − n = 2m ≥ 0, the projection of the thick delta part is precisely the distributional delta part, and this agrees with[36, (7.7)].…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Proof. Notice that for a general k, the Fourier transform of r λ Y k (w) , a homogeneous distribution of degree λ, is homogeneous of degree − (λ + n) , so that the Funk-Hecke formula [18,20] as presented in [9] yields that…”
Section: Some Fourier Transformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equations of the form (3.1) can be brought to diagonal form, by means of a transformation to spherical harmonics (essentially the so-called Funk-Hecke theorem [28]).…”
Section: Invertibility Of the Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, h Y = q Y ∇ δ(x) for some polynomial q Y . The Funk-Hecke formula [9,12], as presented in [3], shows that there are constants λ k , that depend on k but not otherwise on Y, such that…”
Section: Preliminaries and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we explain in the Section 6, for a general α the simplicity of (1.4) is just lost ¶ , but (1.5) remains almost the same for any α. Actually if we replace r 2−n by a more general function f (r) (1.5) remains basically the same but (1.4) is lost; this is a consequence of the Funk-Hecke formula [3,9,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%