2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1901.02530
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fundamental Plane of Black Hole Accretion and its Use as a Black Hole-Mass Estimator

Kayhan Gültekin,
Ashley L. King,
Edward M. Cackett
et al.

Abstract: We present an analysis of the fundamental plane of black hole accretion, an empirical correlation of the mass of a black hole (M), its 5 GHz radio continuum luminosity (νL ν ), and its 2-10 keV X-ray power-law continuum luminosity (L X ). We compile a sample of black holes with primary, direct black hole-mass measurements that also have sensitive, high-spatial-resolution radio and X-ray data. Taking into account a number of systematic sources of uncertainty and their correlations with the measurements, we use … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we choose α B = 0.005. Subsequently, using ṁ and a k for a given black hole, we 6.31 [79], [79], [80], [81], [81] GRO J1655−40 [82], [83], [84], [81], [ [85], [86], [87], [88], [89] GX 339−4 3.81 [94], [95], [96,97], [81], [81] IGR J17091−3624 10.6 − 12. 3 29.00 [109], [110], [111], [112], [112] MAXI J0637−430 † 0.79 [113], [114], [115], [115] [113], [114], [115], [115] V404 Cyg 15.21 [116], [117], [118], [119], [119] H 1743−322 7.44 [120], [121], [121], [122], [122] ⊠ Aneesha et al (2024)(under review).…”
Section: Astrophysical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we choose α B = 0.005. Subsequently, using ṁ and a k for a given black hole, we 6.31 [79], [79], [80], [81], [81] GRO J1655−40 [82], [83], [84], [81], [ [85], [86], [87], [88], [89] GX 339−4 3.81 [94], [95], [96,97], [81], [81] IGR J17091−3624 10.6 − 12. 3 29.00 [109], [110], [111], [112], [112] MAXI J0637−430 † 0.79 [113], [114], [115], [115] [113], [114], [115], [115] V404 Cyg 15.21 [116], [117], [118], [119], [119] H 1743−322 7.44 [120], [121], [121], [122], [122] ⊠ Aneesha et al (2024)(under review).…”
Section: Astrophysical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%