2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Functionality Appreciation Scale (FAS): Development and psychometric evaluation in U.S. community women and men

Abstract: Body functionality has been identified as an important dimension of body image that has the potential to be useful in the prevention and treatment of negative body image and in the enhancement of positive body image. Specifically, cultivating appreciation of body functionality may offset appearance concerns. However, a scale assessing this construct has yet to be developed. Therefore, we developed the Functionality Appreciation Scale (FAS) and examined its psychometric properties among three online community s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
134
2
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(142 reference statements)
14
134
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research is needed to investigate the impact of the approach in other target groups and intersecting social identities, such as in adolescents, other genders, individuals from different cultural backgrounds and professions, and those who have physical conditions that may limit their functional capacities (see Alleva et al, 2017, for a discussion). It will also be interesting to explore other ways in which a functionality-focus can be practiced, for example by actively engaging in embodying activities (e.g., Cook-Cottone et al., 2013;Halliwell, 2015;Mahlo et al, 2016;Menzel & Levine, 2011;Swami, 2017;Swami & Tovée, 2009;Tiggemann et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Future research is needed to investigate the impact of the approach in other target groups and intersecting social identities, such as in adolescents, other genders, individuals from different cultural backgrounds and professions, and those who have physical conditions that may limit their functional capacities (see Alleva et al, 2017, for a discussion). It will also be interesting to explore other ways in which a functionality-focus can be practiced, for example by actively engaging in embodying activities (e.g., Cook-Cottone et al., 2013;Halliwell, 2015;Mahlo et al, 2016;Menzel & Levine, 2011;Swami, 2017;Swami & Tovée, 2009;Tiggemann et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have also proposed that fitness and yoga-based programmes, as well as some forms of dance, lead to improvements in body image by shifting individuals' focus to their body functionality (e.g., Cook-Cottone, Kane, Keddie, & Haugli, 2013;Mahlo & Tiggemann, 2016;Swami & Tovée, 2009;Tiggemann, Coutts, & Clark, 2014). Alleva, Tylka, and Kroon Van Diest (2017) have also shown that appreciating the functionality of one's body is associated with various aspects of a more positive body image and well-being (e.g., broadly conceptualising beauty, self-esteem), and is inversely associated with various aspects of a more negative body image and ill-being (e.g., self-objectification, depression).…”
Section: Focusing On Body Functionality To Improve Body Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Items are measured on a 1–5 scale; higher scores reflect greater IE. The IES‐2 yields internally consistent scores in college women (α = 0.87–0.88) and has demonstrated construct and incremental validity (Alleva, Tylka, & Kroon Van Diest, 2017; Tylka & Kroon Van Diest, 2013). Average Cronbach's alpha was 0.90.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We acknowledge that this study was largely exploratory, although our findings point to a number of interesting avenues that could be explored in future research. Chief among these is the impact of motherhood on embodiment, such as changes in their appreciation of the functionality of their body (Alleva, Tylka, & Kroon Van Diest, 2017) and body agency (Talmon & Ginzburg, 2018), which has received limited focus in the body image literature. Future research could also examine the potential difference between body and breast size dissatisfaction in mothers versus non-mothers, and the impact of breast feeding, time since becoming a mother, identification with the maternal role, and post-pregnancy breast changes on breast size dissatisfaction.…”
Section: Article In Press G Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%