2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The functional importance of structure in unstructured protein regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
78
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, some RBPs recognize RNA secondary structure, sequence elements present within structural elements, or a combination of the two. Many RBPs also contain intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) that could regulate the assembly and dynamics of RNP complexes 108 . Most of the RBPs involved in localization have been identified through genetic screens and/or affinity purification of proteins that bind the localized transcript.…”
Section: Role Of Cis and Trans Factors In Rna Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, some RBPs recognize RNA secondary structure, sequence elements present within structural elements, or a combination of the two. Many RBPs also contain intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) that could regulate the assembly and dynamics of RNP complexes 108 . Most of the RBPs involved in localization have been identified through genetic screens and/or affinity purification of proteins that bind the localized transcript.…”
Section: Role Of Cis and Trans Factors In Rna Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IDP research spans several experimental fields studying protein structure and function including structural biology, biophysics, biochemistry, cell biology, proteomics, comparative genomics, systems biology, synthetic biology and pharmacology ( Figure 1A) ( Blikstad & Ivarsson, 2015; Corbi-Verge & Kim, 2016; Felli & Pierattelli, 2015; Forman-Kay & Mittag, 2013; Plitzko et al , 2017). On a structural level, IDRs do not adopt a single stable highly populated structure, instead, they are structurally heterogeneous, continuously sample a wide ensemble of conformations, with preferentially sampled intramolecular contacts driving local transient secondary structure and compaction of conformations ( Davey, 2019; Dyson & Wright, 2005; Forman-Kay & Mittag, 2013; Holehouse & Pappu, 2018). Therefore, IDRs are more easily described by probabilistic models than the intuitive visual representations of structures of folded protein regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Largely ignored in evolutionary studies, except for a few exceptions (for example see [36][37][38] ), contact variations due to conformational changes are revealed as impossible to neglect in IDP ensembles. These variations impose cumulative constraints on evolutionary rates 39 that may reflect the importance of transitory or preferred conformations in the ensemble 13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the induced-fit model proposes that the adoption of the preferred conformation occurs after binding, in a process that may involve conformational changes and disorder-order transitions. Whatever the relative importance of these models to explain protein biology 12 , pre-existence of low-represented competent conformations or conformational 3 rearrangements after ligand binding, raise the notion that IDPs ensembles are not fully disordered and that conformations with residual structure content play key biological roles 5,[13][14][15][16] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%