2003
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.23-03-00943.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Functional Consequences of Changes in the Strength and Duration of Synaptic Inputs to Oscillatory Neurons

Abstract: We studied the effect of synaptic inputs of different amplitude and duration on neural oscillators by simulating synaptic conductance pulses in a bursting conductance-based pacemaker model and by injecting artificial synaptic conductance pulses into pyloric pacemaker neurons of the lobster stomatogastric ganglion using the dynamic clamp. In the model and the biological neuron, the change in burst period caused by inhibitory and excitatory inputs of increasing strength saturated, such that synaptic inputs above… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
125
1
8

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(55 reference statements)
8
125
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The phase-response curve (Fig.·7D) shows that AGR was capable of resetting the gastric mill rhythm independently of stimulus phase. Phase-response curves show the change in oscillator period elicited by inputs occurring at different phases in the rhythm (Prinz et al, 2003;Wolf and Pearson, 1988) and thus are a solid way of confirming the functional significance of a discrete input to an oscillatory system (Abramovich-Sivan and Akselrod, 1998). As a result of AGR resetting capabilities, rhythmic AGR stimulation entrained the rhythm (Fig.·7A).…”
Section: Effects On the Pyloric And Gastric Circuitmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The phase-response curve (Fig.·7D) shows that AGR was capable of resetting the gastric mill rhythm independently of stimulus phase. Phase-response curves show the change in oscillator period elicited by inputs occurring at different phases in the rhythm (Prinz et al, 2003;Wolf and Pearson, 1988) and thus are a solid way of confirming the functional significance of a discrete input to an oscillatory system (Abramovich-Sivan and Akselrod, 1998). As a result of AGR resetting capabilities, rhythmic AGR stimulation entrained the rhythm (Fig.·7A).…”
Section: Effects On the Pyloric And Gastric Circuitmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Fig . 3C illustrates another, equally important, feature of these PRCs: the effect of increasing the inhibitory synaptic conductance on the oscillator saturates (28,30), so that once the synaptic input has reached a certain level, further increases in its amplitude produce no additional change in the PRC (seen as the overlap in the red and black dots in Fig. 3).…”
Section: Synaptic Strength Does Not Always Mattermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nonetheless, there are circumstances in which changes in synaptic strength may have little or no effect on network performance (28,29). This can be seen dramatically if one looks at the effects of inputs to a neuronal oscillator (28,30). It is often useful to determine the influence of an input to an oscillator by measuring its phase-response curve (PRC), which captures the response of the oscillator to perturbations at different times in the oscillator's cycle (31)(32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Synaptic Strength Does Not Always Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the application of 4-AP and ATX II also changed spike shape, which will directly affect neuronal firing properties and synaptic transmission. Thus, the overall effects of changing I A or I Na ϩ properties on network activities would be multifaceted and intricate to interpret (Prinz et al, 2003). The contribution of both currents to activity gating can be explained by interpolating firing thresholds at different membrane potentials (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%