2017
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The functional architectures of addition and subtraction: Network discovery using fMRI and DCM

Abstract: The neuronal mechanisms underlying arithmetic calculations are not well understood but the differences between mental addition and subtraction could be particularly revealing. Using fMRI and dynamic causal modeling (DCM), this study aimed to identify the distinct neuronal architectures engaged by the cognitive processes of simple addition and subtraction. Our results revealed significantly greater activation during subtraction in regions along the dorsal pathway, including the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Men and women had many similar increases in activation and deactivation to psychosocial stress in brain regions that contribute to the execution of emotionally and cognitively stressful tasks. This included areas implicated in mental arithmetic, phonological language processing, visual processing, spatial awareness, working memory, and emotion regulation (middle frontal gyrus, superior frontal gyrus, inferior parietal lobe, supramarginal gyrus, and cingulate gyrus) [7581]. Women with CAD, however, showed greater activation in response to mental stress in a brain region implicated in language processing (middle temporal gyrus) [78] when compared to men with CAD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Men and women had many similar increases in activation and deactivation to psychosocial stress in brain regions that contribute to the execution of emotionally and cognitively stressful tasks. This included areas implicated in mental arithmetic, phonological language processing, visual processing, spatial awareness, working memory, and emotion regulation (middle frontal gyrus, superior frontal gyrus, inferior parietal lobe, supramarginal gyrus, and cingulate gyrus) [7581]. Women with CAD, however, showed greater activation in response to mental stress in a brain region implicated in language processing (middle temporal gyrus) [78] when compared to men with CAD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then used “Network discovery” (Friston et al, ) to make inferences on the parameters (i.e., strength and direction of coupling between the modeled regions) of the best‐fitting reduced model. Via Bayesian model reduction (Friston & Penny, ), this approach implements an exhaustive search over all possible combinations of connections (and how they are differentially modulated by the degree of affectivity and cooperativity) to identify the best model and thus the underlying functional architecture (Yang et al, ). In DCM12, this is done via the “Optimize” routine, which searches over all possible reduced submodels of a fully connected model and uses a post‐hoc model selection routine to identify the best fitting one, in terms of the tradeoff between model fit and model complexity, at the group level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty in performing the subtraction task may be due to a requirement for higher neural activity compared to the phonologic fluency task. The subtraction task triggered neural activity in the bilateral inferior parietal network (20,27), whereas phonologic fluency activated neural networks only in the left inferior frontal cortex and supplementary motor area (28)(29)(30). In addition, working memory is required for the subtraction task, and this task is more directly related to executive function than the verbal fluency task (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%