1979
DOI: 10.1080/01977261.1979.11721105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Functional Analysis of Scrapers: Problems, New Techniques and Cautions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to note that with regard to edge angle, the mean for stepping (71.9°) is close to those found by Cantwell (1979) in the analysis of the hardwood "Havana" scrapers (70.7°) and by Hayden and Kamminga (1979) in their report on Australian woodworking tools (70.0°).…”
Section: Edge Anglesupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is interesting to note that with regard to edge angle, the mean for stepping (71.9°) is close to those found by Cantwell (1979) in the analysis of the hardwood "Havana" scrapers (70.7°) and by Hayden and Kamminga (1979) in their report on Australian woodworking tools (70.0°).…”
Section: Edge Anglesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Thickness, too, would logically be a factor in determining use, especially in such activities as chopping and adzing, and has been recorded as an integral attribute (albeit not a determining one) in an analysis of hardwood scrapers by Hester et al (1973). These three variables, thenLower Fredericksburg Basin Page 107 edge angle, weight, and thickness-will be related to types of edge damage in an attempt to establish values of what Cantwell (1979) has called "diagnostic criteria" for this collection.…”
Section: Use-wear Analysis Of Bifaces and Unifaces (Price)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether or not a microlith was retouched into a point did not affect the angle or extent of retouch. This is also true with reference to Clarkson's (2002) (Wilmsen 1968, Cantwell 1979, Andrefsky 2005, this may suggest that side-retouched tools were more likely to be used for cutting activities and end-retouched tools for scraping (although this remains a speculative conclusion).…”
Section: Coresmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Microchipping is distributed randomly across the tips in inverse proportion to the number of striations. This type of microwear is often caused by the movement of a tool within its haft (Anderson, 1980;Cantwell, 1979;Johannessen and Hasdorf, 1994;Mansur, 1982), suggesting that the tip was inserted into a haft and the proximal end used.…”
Section: Usewearmentioning
confidence: 97%