2020
DOI: 10.1002/aps.1691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The function of the inner witness in interrupting screening mechanisms of perpetrators' language

Abstract: This paper analyzes testimonies taken from Israeli soldiers by the organization "Breaking the Silence," focusing on the interaction between the screening mechanisms of perpetrator's language, which split between the overt reporting of actions and the deep recognition of their meaning-and what we call "the function of the inner witness," which operates against these mechanisms. Three types of transformation, allowing a move from turning one's back to looking things in the eye, are described by means of three ty… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conceptualizing the experience of committing violent acts and exploring the related meaning-making processes presents a methodological challenge, as it is inherently difficult to assess such a complex phenomenon. However, previous studies that used retrospective testimonies to study perpetrators’ narratives have proven to be valuable in revealing authentic evidence that expanded our understanding of these inaccessible areas of research ( Meyer-Parlapanis et al, 2016 ; Amir and HaCohen, 2020 , 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptualizing the experience of committing violent acts and exploring the related meaning-making processes presents a methodological challenge, as it is inherently difficult to assess such a complex phenomenon. However, previous studies that used retrospective testimonies to study perpetrators’ narratives have proven to be valuable in revealing authentic evidence that expanded our understanding of these inaccessible areas of research ( Meyer-Parlapanis et al, 2016 ; Amir and HaCohen, 2020 , 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of perpetrators’ testimony from the archive of Breaking the Silence 5 suggests a massive use of screening mechanisms (Amir 2017, 2020; Amir and HaCohen 2020, 2021): heavy use of passive verbs, as well as frequent use of passive rather than active constructions, and of the first person plural rather than the first person singular, camouflaging the speaker’s responsibility; creation of an alternative moral hierarchy in which espousal of a lower moral value comes to conceal breaches of a higher one; creation of a false causality that supposedly explains the sequence of events; overt description of concrete facts accompanied by covert denial of their moral and emotional meaning; displacement of the victim into the position of the perpetrator, as when perpetrators cast themselves as the “true victims” of the political regime rather than admitting their responsibility for its, and their own, actions; and, finally, various expressions of pseudo-regret and false gestures of contrition, producing an illusion of compassion in testimonies whose hidden agenda is to cover up or undo the evil rather than recognize it.…”
Section: Banal Evil and False Pardonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the banality of evil is expressed not only in concrete obedience to the commands but also in retrospective testimony about injustices done in the name of that obedience, testimony characterized by language that makes extensive use of deceptive screen mechanisms. I have coined the term screen confessions to denote a common feature of perpetrators’ language (Amir 2017, 2020; Amir and HaCohen 2020, 2021). What are these screen confessions?…”
Section: Banal Evil and False Pardonmentioning
confidence: 99%