2013
DOI: 10.1530/rep-12-0316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The function of chaperone proteins in the assemblage of protein complexes involved in gamete adhesion and fusion processes

Abstract: The remarkable complexity of the molecular events governing adhesion and fusion of the male and female gametes is becoming apparent. Novel research suggests that these highly specific cellular interactions are facilitated by multiprotein complexes that are delivered to and/or assembled on the surface of the gametes by molecular chaperones in preparation for sperm-egg interaction. While the activation of these molecular chaperones and the mechanisms by which they shuttle proteins to the surface of the cell rema… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All involve the same proteins, namely molecular chaperones HSPA2 and HSPAA1, as well as Subunits 1 and 5 of the chaperonin‐containing‐TCP1 complex. Indeed, evidence suggests that these chaperones and chaperonins are implicated in the assembly of zona pellucida recognition protein complex, and the translocation of these complexes to the sperm surface during capacitation (Bromfield & Nixon, ). In humans, impaired sperm–zona binding is associated with reduced expression of HSPA2 from the sperm proteome (Redgrove et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All involve the same proteins, namely molecular chaperones HSPA2 and HSPAA1, as well as Subunits 1 and 5 of the chaperonin‐containing‐TCP1 complex. Indeed, evidence suggests that these chaperones and chaperonins are implicated in the assembly of zona pellucida recognition protein complex, and the translocation of these complexes to the sperm surface during capacitation (Bromfield & Nixon, ). In humans, impaired sperm–zona binding is associated with reduced expression of HSPA2 from the sperm proteome (Redgrove et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, a sub-physiological level of cholesterol in mouse oocytes causes a delay in second polar body extrusion and low fertilization rates [18]. Cholesterol mediates membrane curvature during fusion events [19] and recent advances start to reveal common mechanisms also in gamete interaction [18,20,21]. It is clear that abnormal levels of membrane cholesterol could adversely affect fertilization and subsequent embryo development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, protein disulphide isomerase family A, member 3 (PDIA3) was also upregulated in epididymal spermatozoa following 9 weeks of treatment with BEP (Maselli et al, 2012). As recent data have suggested an important role for these upregulated proteins in fertilization (Ellerman et al, 2006;Bromfield & Nixon, 2013), we did Western blot analysis as an independent confirmation of these findings (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Bep-induced Upregulation Of Spermatozoa-egg-binding Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Various HSP family members are the subject of dynamic redistribution as spermatozoa undergo capacitation, with current models suggesting that the phosphorylation of these chaperones during capacitation triggers their active role in the assembly of zona pellucida recognition proteins into complexes and/or the translocation of these complexes to the surface of spermatozoa in preparation for fertilization (Ecroyd et al, 2003;Asquith et al, 2004;Nixon et al, 2005;Gadella, 2008). Thus, with their major involvement in the regulation of zona pellucida binding, it is expected that chaperone-laden complexes may also assist in the activation of the fusion machinery and/or organization of functional fusion complexes (Bromfield & Nixon, 2013). Among the other chaperones present on the sperm surface that mediate zona pellucida interactions are CCT/TriC (Dun et al, 2011), HSPA2 (Naaby-Hansen & Herr, 2010Redgrove et al, 2012Redgrove et al, , 2013, HSPD1 (Boilard et al, 2004;Asquith et al, 2005), HSPA5 (Boilard et al, 2004) and HSPE1 (Walsh et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%