1987
DOI: 10.1016/0167-2681(87)90019-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The function of authority in transaction cost economics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
94
0
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
94
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…But at the same time we should not ignore, as Dow (1987) points out, that such discretionary control, along with hierarchy and the division of labor, generates the structural preconditions for "employer opportunism. "…”
Section: Power and Redistributive Institutional Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…But at the same time we should not ignore, as Dow (1987) points out, that such discretionary control, along with hierarchy and the division of labor, generates the structural preconditions for "employer opportunism. "…”
Section: Power and Redistributive Institutional Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us just mention three major difficulties of the theory which are crucial for the argument which follows (for a broader critical appraisal of transaction costs theory cf., for instance, Granovetter (1985) and Dow (1987)). …”
Section: Problem Solving Tasks Vs Transactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The firm has better control of opportunistic behavior due to the authority relationship (Dow, 1987) Grossman and Hart (1986), the auditing powers of the firm are superior to the auditing capabilities of contracting parties (Williamson, 1975 (Chandler, 1977 (Eisenhardt, 1985;Ouchi, 1980 (Grossman & Hart, 1986), incentives change, and governance structures (ability to monitor and reward) change (Williamson, 1985 The loss of high powered market incentives suggests that internal organization may also be more costly than the market mechanism (Williamson, 1985), undercutting the profit incentive for integration. One explanation is that the lack of direct competitive pressures on the cost of the intermediate products may allow increasing levels of slack (Cyert & March, 1963) (Harrigan, 1985c).…”
Section: Profitmentioning
confidence: 99%