2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2016.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The full phase space of a model in the Calogero–Ruijsenaars family

Abstract: We complete the recent derivation of a Ruijsenaars type system that arises as a reduction of the natural free system on the Heisenberg double of SU(n, n). The previous analysis by Marshall focused on a dense open submanifold of the reduced phase space, and here we describe the full phase space wherein Liouville integrability of the system holds by construction.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We arrive to this expression for I ± k through the following chain of arguments. It is known that the Calogero-Moser-Sutherland models and their RS generalisations can be obtained at the classical level through the hamiltonian or Poisson reduction applied to a system exhibiting free motion on one of the suitably chosen initial finite-or infinite-dimensional phase spaces [16]- [23], [3][4][5][6]. For instance, the RS model with the rational potential is obtained by the hamiltonian reduction of the cotangent bundle T * G = G ⋉ G , where G ia Lie group and G is its Lie algebra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We arrive to this expression for I ± k through the following chain of arguments. It is known that the Calogero-Moser-Sutherland models and their RS generalisations can be obtained at the classical level through the hamiltonian or Poisson reduction applied to a system exhibiting free motion on one of the suitably chosen initial finite-or infinite-dimensional phase spaces [16]- [23], [3][4][5][6]. For instance, the RS model with the rational potential is obtained by the hamiltonian reduction of the cotangent bundle T * G = G ⋉ G , where G ia Lie group and G is its Lie algebra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ruijsenaars-Schneider (RS) models [1,2] continue to provide an outstanding theoretical laboratory for the study of various aspects of Liouville integrability, both at the classical and quantum level, see, for instance, [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Also, new interesting applications of these type of models were recently found in conformal field theories [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if we leave the type A n , we can observe that until recent works by Fehér and collaborators (see e.g. [FG,FK2,FK3,FK4,FM] mostly in the real case), integrable systems in the trigonometric RS family are generally devised using only a suitable Lax matrix, as they originally appear in [RS], without geometric perspectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference is that the reduction is performed on a space which may not be symplectic, and the moment map takes values in the Lie group rather than the Lie algebra. Not attempting at a comprehensive review, we refer the reader to some of the more recent papers [P,FK1,FK2,FK3,M,FG], where the Ruijsenaars-Schneider model and its variants are treated by the method of (quasi-)Hamiltonian reduction, and where further references can be found. Let us also mention an alternative geometric approach to many-body problems by Krichever [Kr1], in which the Lax matrix structure play the central role instead, and the Hamiltonian picture is derived from that, cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%