2000
DOI: 10.1191/026921500669635136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Frontal Lobe Score: part I: construction of a mental status of frontal systems

Abstract: The Frontal Lobe Score is a useful screening instrument for the clinical detection of effects of frontal lobe damage.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it seems likely that text-level language processes are a component of executive functions that cannot be simply explained by more basic subprocesses (cf. Ettlin et al, 2000). The perseveration score from the MCST was related to the judgment times and to the errors in incoherent trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it seems likely that text-level language processes are a component of executive functions that cannot be simply explained by more basic subprocesses (cf. Ettlin et al, 2000). The perseveration score from the MCST was related to the judgment times and to the errors in incoherent trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ettlin et al [48] developed a bedside mental status examination to assess frontal lobe functions: the Frontal Lobe Score (FLS). This scale screens both cognitive and behavioral effects of frontal lobe dysfunction.…”
Section: Bedside Frontal Lobe Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the MMSE, a score <24 was taken as evidence for overall cognitive deficit [39]. Additionally, we used the frontal lobe score (FLS) for the assessment of frontal functions and to test for potential frontal lobe damage on a behavioral dimension with a cutoff of ≥12 [40]. The FLS consisted of 6 dimensions: (1) motor control and programming, tested with control of reflexes and motor impulses and performance of a complex series of movements, (2) mental control, tested with flexibility in cognitive shifting (Trail Making Test [41]) and with the ability to reverse automated series, (3) personality and emotion, assessed by 12 items from the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale [42], (4) language (examination of spontaneous speech and narrative discourse), (5) semantic verbal fluency and nonverbal fluency (Five-Point Test [43]) and (6) memory as evaluated by a word list learning test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%