1966
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(66)90018-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The friction and visco-elastic properties of polymeric solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
87
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
10
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…47 Internal friction dictates the degree of local segmental motion, and thus, is responsible for the bulk viscoelastic and relaxation properties of polymeric materials. Grosch 18 and Ludema and Tabor 48 were the first to combine the velocity at the friction peak with the frequency for the maximum viscoelastic loss to deduce a characteristic dissipative length scale. However, with their macroscopic techniques, they could only suspect dissipation through segmental relaxation.…”
Section: A Discussion In the Light Of Molecular Relaxation Within Thementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…47 Internal friction dictates the degree of local segmental motion, and thus, is responsible for the bulk viscoelastic and relaxation properties of polymeric materials. Grosch 18 and Ludema and Tabor 48 were the first to combine the velocity at the friction peak with the frequency for the maximum viscoelastic loss to deduce a characteristic dissipative length scale. However, with their macroscopic techniques, they could only suspect dissipation through segmental relaxation.…”
Section: A Discussion In the Light Of Molecular Relaxation Within Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, these early models neglected the inherent viscous attributes of elastomers. According to Savkoor 28 as well as Ludema and Tabor, 25 sliding may proceed by an activated process, but the extent to which the two surfaces come into contact depends on modulus and sliding velocity. Hidden in more macroscopic terms, these approaches of Savkoor 24 and Ludema and Tabor 25 are similar to the model of Schallamach,20 where the activated nature of the sliding process is still attributed to adhesive debonding.…”
Section: Stochastic Adhesive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the seminal adhesion theory of metal friction of Bowden and Tabor (1950), Ludema & Tabor (1966) described the adhesive friction force between a spherical hard indenter and a flat viscoelastic surface as a combination of two physical terms :…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Moreover, it is said that the friction frequency are the high frequency band(10 2~1 0 6 Hz). However, a general viscoelasticity evaluation method DMA (Dynamic Mechanical Analysis) is limited in the low frequency(10 1~1 0 2 Hz)measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%